The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Dec 9, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The diff updates the attestation information to include the Clerk's name and reflects the bill's referral to the Senate. No substantive policy change has occurred between v3 and v4.

H.R. 2916·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 14, 2025

To authorize, ratify, and confirm the Agreement of Settlement and Compromise to Resolve the Akwesasne Mohawk Land Claim in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Passed HouseNative AmericansMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Stefanik, Elise M. [R-NY-21]
Committees
Indian Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 3, 2026

Bottom line

This bill provides federal legal finality to a long-standing land claim settlement, clarifying land status and jurisdiction for the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe and other involved parties in New York.

What it actually does

This bill formally authorizes, ratifies, and confirms the Agreement of Settlement and Compromise to Resolve the Akwesasne Mohawk Land Claim in New York. It also designates lands owned or acquired by the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe within specified Settlement Acquisition Areas as 'Indian Country,' subject to the terms of the underlying agreement.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill delivers long-overdue justice and certainty for the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe by resolving a complex land claim, fostering self-determination, and clarifying jurisdictional boundaries for all parties involved. It represents a mutually negotiated resolution that benefits both the Tribe and the State of New York, promoting stability and economic development.

Opponents contend

Given that this bill ratifies a negotiated settlement, direct opposition to its passage is not widely evident. However, some might raise concerns about the expansion of Indian Country, its implications for state and local taxation, or potential jurisdictional complexities, even if these issues were addressed in the underlying settlement agreement.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing for quick comprehension by any interested reader.

Section 1(1)

Authorization of Akwesasne Mohawk Land Claim Settlement Agreement

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision legally approves and makes binding the 'Agreement of Settlement and Compromise to Resolve the Akwesasne Mohawk Land Claim in the State of New York.' This agreement was made between the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, the State of New York, two counties, two towns, and the New York Power Authority. It formalizes a negotiated resolution to a long-standing dispute.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSaint Regis Mohawk Tribe, Mohawk Council of AkwesasneImpactLegal certainty, resolution of land claim, enhanced self-governance.MechanismFederal statutory approval of a negotiated settlement.ScaleSignificant for tribal sovereignty and land base.
GroupState of New York, Franklin and Saint Lawrence Counties, Fort Covington and Bombay Towns, New York Power AuthorityImpactResolution of legal disputes, clarification of land ownership and jurisdiction, reduced litigation risk.MechanismFederal statutory approval of a negotiated settlement.ScaleSignificant for state/local governance and legal stability.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for bringing finality to a decades-long land dispute, providing stability and a clear path forward for all parties. It respects tribal sovereignty and the outcome of good-faith negotiations.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the federal ratification of a comprehensive, negotiated land claim settlement that has already been agreed upon by all involved parties, as it represents a resolution rather than a new imposition.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension resolved by this provision is the long-standing legal uncertainty surrounding the Akwesasne Mohawk land claim versus the desire for a definitive, mutually agreed-upon resolution that balances tribal rights with state and local interests.

Section 1(2)

Confirmation of Related Land Transfers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes, ratifies, and confirms any transfer of land, right-of-way, or easement that was part of the claims in three specific lawsuits involving the Canadian Saint Regis Band of Mohawk Indians and the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe against New York. This ensures that any land transactions stemming from these legal cases are legally recognized and confirmed by federal law.

Section 2

Designation of Settlement Lands as Indian Country

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section declares that certain lands will be considered 'Indian Country' as defined in federal law (18 U.S.C. 1151(a)). This includes land owned by the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe within the 'Settlement Acquisition Areas' on the effective date of the agreement, and any land they acquire within these areas afterward. This designation means these lands will be subject to tribal jurisdiction and federal law regarding Indian affairs, as per the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this