The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2964·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 17, 2025

Fight Fentanyl Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Taylor, David [R-OH-2]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 17, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to bolster federal law enforcement and prosecutorial capabilities to combat fentanyl trafficking through increased funding, enhanced data collection, and dedicated legal resources.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 to enhance federal efforts against fentanyl. It mandates new reporting requirements for High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTAs) on fentanyl seizures and trends, increases authorized appropriations for the HIDTA program and the Counterdrug Technology Assessment Center (CTAC), and directs the Attorney General to provide additional prosecutorial resources specifically for fentanyl-related cases.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is a crucial and necessary step to address the devastating fentanyl crisis by equipping law enforcement and prosecutors with the essential resources and improved intelligence needed to interdict fentanyl, dismantle trafficking organizations, and ultimately save lives across the nation.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that while the goal of combating fentanyl is critical, a strategy heavily focused on increased enforcement and prosecution, without a commensurate emphasis on public health, prevention, and treatment initiatives, may not effectively address the root causes of the crisis or lead to sustainable long-term solutions.

The bill is concise and clearly structured, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions within a short timeframe.

Section 2(1) (amending 21 U.S.C. 1705(g)(3))

Mandates Fentanyl-Specific Reporting for HIDTAs

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision requires High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTAs) to submit annual reports detailing how their funds were used to investigate fentanyl trafficking. These reports must include the amounts of fentanyl or fentanyl-related substances seized and provide law enforcement and predictive data on patterns and trends in the abuse, trafficking, and transportation of these substances. The goal is to gather more specific data on the fentanyl crisis at a regional level.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupHigh Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTAs)ImpactIncreased administrative burden due to new reporting requirements, but also potential for improved strategic planning.MechanismStatutory amendment to existing reporting mandates.ScaleAffects all designated HIDTAs nationwide.
GroupFederal, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agenciesImpactAccess to more granular and predictive data on fentanyl trafficking, potentially improving intelligence and operational effectiveness.MechanismImproved data collection and dissemination from HIDTAs.ScaleNational benefit for drug enforcement efforts.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this enhanced data collection is essential for developing more effective, data-driven strategies to combat the fentanyl crisis, allowing for better resource allocation and targeted interventions against trafficking networks.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against enhanced data collection, though some might express concerns about the potential for increased administrative burden on local agencies without corresponding support for reporting infrastructure.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the critical need for comprehensive data to inform counter-fentanyl strategies against the potential for increased administrative workload on HIDTA programs.

Section 2(2)(A) (amending 21 U.S.C. 1706(l)(2))

Requires HIDTA Limitations and Recommendations Report

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision adds a requirement for HIDTA reports to include an assessment of any limitations hindering their ability to achieve their purpose or goals. Furthermore, it mandates that these reports offer recommendations to address identified limitations, which could involve changes in resource allocation, partnerships, or even legislative authority. This aims to foster continuous improvement and address systemic challenges within the HIDTA program.

Section 2(2)(B) (amending 21 U.S.C. 1706(p))

Authorizes Increased Funding for HIDTA Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision significantly increases the authorized appropriation level for the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) program. It sets the new authorization at $333,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2030. This authorization provides the potential for a substantial boost in federal funding for HIDTAs, enabling them to expand operations and enhance efforts against drug trafficking.

Section 2(2)(C) (amending 21 U.S.C. 1706(s))

Boosts Funding and Focus for Counterdrug Technology and Fentanyl Interdiction

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision increases the authorized appropriation for the Counterdrug Technology Assessment Center (CTAC) from $10,000,000 to $14,224,000. Crucially, it also explicitly expands the purposes for which these funds can be used to include providing assistance to Federal, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies for investigations and activities related to the interdiction of fentanyl and other substances. Additionally, it allows for any other purpose the Director of ONDCP deems appropriate to enhance fentanyl prevention, seizure, and interdiction activities.

Section 2(2)(D) (adding subsection (t) to 21 U.S.C. 1706)

Directs Attorney General to Provide Fentanyl Prosecutorial Resources

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision mandates that the Attorney General make available sufficient investigative and prosecution resources, including the temporary reassignment of Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) for fiscal years 2024 through 2030. These reassigned AUSAs are directed to prioritize the investigation and prosecution of organizations and individuals trafficking in fentanyl and fentanyl-related substances. The bill also requires the Attorney General to establish a process within 180 days for the Director of ONDCP, in consultation with HIDTA Executive Boards, to request such temporary reassignments.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this