The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2999·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 24, 2025

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that not more than 10 percent of a monthly benefit may be withheld on account of overpayments.

IntroducedSocial WelfareSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-3]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 24, 2025

Bottom line

This bill aims to protect Social Security beneficiaries from severe financial hardship by significantly reducing the maximum monthly amount the SSA can recover for non-fraudulent overpayments.

What it actually does

This bill amends title II of the Social Security Act to limit the amount the Social Security Administration (SSA) can withhold from a monthly benefit to recover an overpayment. Specifically, it caps the withholding at 10% of the monthly benefit amount, unless the individual requests a higher recovery rate. This limitation applies only when the overpayment was not due to fraud or similar fault on the part of the individual.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill provides crucial financial relief and stability for Social Security beneficiaries who are often low-income and severely impacted by large overpayment recovery deductions, preventing undue hardship when errors are not their fault. They contend it addresses a systemic issue where the SSA's current recovery practices can leave individuals with insufficient funds for basic living expenses, forcing them into poverty.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that limiting the recovery rate to 10% could significantly prolong the repayment period for overpayments, potentially increasing administrative costs for the Social Security Administration and delaying the return of funds to the trust fund. They might also contend that while hardship is a concern, the current system allows for waiver requests and that a blanket 10% cap could be overly restrictive, potentially creating a moral hazard or encouraging longer repayment periods than necessary.

The bill text is very short and uses clear language, making it highly accessible for anyone to understand its core change quickly.

Section 1(a)

Limitation on Overpayment Withholding

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Social Security Act to cap the amount the Social Security Administration (SSA) can withhold from a beneficiary's monthly payment to recover an overpayment. If the overpayment was not due to fraud or similar fault on the part of the individual, the SSA cannot decrease the monthly benefit by more than 10% of the amount payable. This cap can be overridden if the individual specifically requests a higher recovery rate, allowing them to repay the overpayment more quickly if desired.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSocial Security beneficiaries who have received overpayments not due to fraudImpactFinancial relief and stability, as monthly deductions for overpayment recovery will be significantly limited, ensuring a larger portion of their benefit remains available for living expenses.MechanismStatutory cap on the percentage of monthly benefit that can be withheld.ScaleAffects all beneficiaries nationwide who are subject to non-fraudulent overpayment recovery.
GroupSocial Security Administration (SSA)ImpactOperational adjustments, potentially increased administrative burden, and longer recovery periods for overpayments.MechanismRequires changes to overpayment recovery policies and procedures, including processing requests for higher recovery rates.ScaleImpacts the SSA's financial management and customer service operations.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is essential to prevent severe financial hardship for vulnerable beneficiaries who are often living on fixed incomes. They highlight that many overpayments are due to administrative errors or complex rules, not beneficiary fault, and current recovery rates can be devastating, pushing individuals into poverty or homelessness. The 10% cap provides a crucial safety net.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that while protecting beneficiaries is important, a universal 10% cap could significantly extend the time it takes to recover overpayments, potentially impacting the solvency of the Social Security trust fund and increasing the administrative costs associated with managing these longer repayment schedules. They may also contend that the current waiver process is sufficient for hardship cases.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need to recover improperly paid funds to maintain the integrity of the Social Security system against the imperative to protect beneficiaries from financial destitution due to errors often beyond their control. It trades faster recovery of funds for enhanced beneficiary financial stability and reduced hardship.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this