The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3017·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 24, 2025

Measuring State Healthcare Freedom Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Spartz, Victoria [R-IN-5]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 24, 2025

Bottom line

This bill mandates a decade-long annual study by HHS to gather and publicly report comprehensive data on various aspects of state-level healthcare competition and consolidation.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to conduct an annual study for 10 years on health care competition and consolidation at the state level. The study will collect data on various metrics, including licensing requirements, mergers and acquisitions, state laws like Certificates of Public Advantage and Certificates of Need, availability of alternative health insurance, and market concentration using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. HHS is required to consult with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, and to publish annual reports and publicly accessible datasets.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this study will provide crucial, standardized data to understand market dynamics, identify barriers to competition, and inform policy decisions aimed at lowering healthcare costs and increasing access for consumers by promoting a more competitive environment. They believe that increased transparency through robust data collection is essential for addressing the growing consolidation in the healthcare sector and empowering states to enact more effective reforms.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that mandating a 10-year annual study could impose an unnecessary administrative burden and significant expense on HHS, potentially duplicating existing efforts or generating data that is difficult to interpret or act upon effectively. They might also question the scope or utility of certain metrics, suggesting that some data points may not directly correlate with competition or could be misinterpreted without deeper contextual analysis.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its provisions quickly and thoroughly.

Section 2(a)

Mandate for Annual Study on Healthcare Competition

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to conduct an annual study for 10 consecutive years, starting from the bill's enactment date. The study's focus is on the state of health care competition and consolidation at the State level, aiming to systematically collect and analyze market dynamics.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of Health and Human Services (HHS)ImpactIncreased workload and responsibility for conducting and reporting on a long-term, comprehensive study.MechanismScale
GroupFederal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust DivisionImpactRequirement to consult with HHS and furnish necessary information for the study.MechanismScale
GroupPolicymakers and ResearchersImpactAccess to new, standardized, and longitudinal data on healthcare markets to inform policy and research.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a consistent, long-term study is essential to track trends in healthcare markets, identify areas where competition is lacking, and provide evidence-based insights for legislative and regulatory reforms aimed at improving affordability and access. They believe that a decade-long commitment ensures comprehensive data collection that can reveal long-term trends and the effects of policy changes.

Critics contend

Some might argue that a 10-year mandate is overly prescriptive and may not allow for sufficient flexibility in adapting to evolving data needs or research priorities, potentially leading to redundant or less impactful studies over such an extended period. Concerns could also be raised about the sustained resource allocation required.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire for comprehensive, longitudinal data to inform policy and the potential for significant administrative costs and resource allocation over a decade, which might limit flexibility for other research priorities.

Section 2(d)

Specific Data Metrics for the Study

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section specifies the exact types of data the annual study must collect. This includes detailed information on state licensing requirements for various healthcare professionals, data on vertical and horizontal mergers and acquisitions across multiple healthcare sectors (hospitals, insurance, ambulatory practices, therapy, telehealth), the number of state laws establishing 'certificates of public advantage' and 'certificates of need,' the availability of alternative health insurance options (like short-term limited duration insurance and association health plans), the number of various healthcare facilities in operation, and market concentration using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index for key services.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this