The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3043·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 28, 2025

Accountability in Foreign Animal Research Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. McClain, Lisa C. [R-MI-9]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 28, 2025

Bottom line

This bill aims to prevent U.S. taxpayer funds from supporting animal experimentation in countries deemed adversarial to the United States, citing national security and ethical concerns.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the Secretary of Health and Human Services from directly conducting or indirectly funding biomedical research or experimentation involving vertebrate animal testing in facilities located in, or owned or controlled by, specified foreign countries. The bill explicitly names China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, and allows for the designation of additional countries of concern with a reporting requirement to Congress.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill protects taxpayer dollars from being used in countries that may not adhere to ethical animal welfare standards or that pose national security risks, ensuring U.S. funds align with national interests and values. They contend it is critical to prevent U.S. resources from inadvertently aiding potential adversaries or supporting practices inconsistent with American ethical principles.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that such prohibitions could hinder international scientific collaboration, potentially delaying critical biomedical advancements, or that it could be seen as an overreach if not carefully targeted. They may also raise concerns that isolating scientific communities in these nations could reduce transparency and understanding of their research activities.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Prohibition on Funding Research on Animals in Certain Foreign Countries

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section prohibits the Secretary of Health and Human Services from directly conducting or indirectly funding (via grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, or other funding vehicles) biomedical research involving vertebrate animal testing. This prohibition applies to any facility or entity located in, or owned or controlled by, specific foreign countries or any other country that the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretaries of State and Defense, determines to be a foreign country of concern.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)ImpactRestrictedMechanismDirect prohibition on conducting or funding specific types of research in certain foreign nations.ScaleSignificant, as it impacts all biomedical research involving vertebrate animals under HHS purview.
GroupResearch institutions and scientists in specified foreign countriesImpactExcludedMechanismLoss of potential U.S. federal funding and collaboration opportunities for animal research.ScalePotentially significant for institutions reliant on international funding or partnerships.
GroupU.S. research institutions collaborating with foreign entitiesImpactRestrictedMechanismInability to collaborate on animal research with entities in prohibited countries using U.S. federal funds.ScaleModerate, depending on existing collaborations and the availability of alternative partners.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision safeguards U.S. taxpayer funds from being used to support research in nations that may not share U.S. values regarding animal welfare or that could pose national security concerns, ensuring accountability and ethical alignment of federal spending.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that such broad prohibitions could impede global scientific progress, particularly in areas requiring international collaboration, and might limit access to unique research environments or expertise, potentially slowing down advancements in health and medicine.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire to prevent U.S. funds from supporting potentially unethical or adversarial activities with the potential impact on international scientific collaboration and the pace of biomedical research, weighing national interests against global scientific advancement.

Section 2(b)

Enumeration of Foreign Countries

prominently featuredstraightforward

This subsection explicitly lists the People's Republic of China (including the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region), the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), and the Russian Federation as the initial "foreign countries specified" where the prohibition on U.S.-funded animal research applies.

Section 2(c)

Reporting Requirement for New Countries of Concern

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretaries of State and Defense, must submit a detailed report to specific Congressional committees within 60 days whenever a new foreign country is determined to be a "country of concern" and added to the prohibition list. This ensures Congressional oversight of future designations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this