The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3093·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 30, 2025

REHIRE Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8]
Committees
Oversight and Government Reform Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 30, 2025

Bottom line

The REHIRE Act provides a temporary hiring advantage to career federal employees involuntarily separated without cause, aiming to facilitate their re-entry into the civil service.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a temporary hiring preference for certain federal employees who are involuntarily removed from the civil service between January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2027. These individuals would be deemed 'preference eligible' and receive 5 additional points on their competitive service applications. The preference explicitly excludes those removed from political positions, for misconduct, or for unacceptable performance, and is set to expire five years after the bill's enactment.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is a vital safeguard for the non-partisan civil service, protecting experienced federal employees from politically motivated or arbitrary removals. It ensures that valuable institutional knowledge is retained and that career public servants have a pathway back to federal employment, thereby strengthening government continuity and expertise.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that this bill creates an unfair advantage for a specific group of job applicants, potentially undermining the principle of merit-based hiring and increasing competition for other qualified candidates. Concerns could also be raised about the potential for administrative challenges in consistently applying the exclusion criteria for misconduct or poor performance.

The bill is exceptionally short and clearly written, allowing ample time for any reader to fully understand its provisions and implications.

Section 2(a)

Hiring Preference for Involuntarily Removed Federal Employees

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision grants a significant advantage to federal employees who are involuntarily removed from the civil service within a specific two-year window (January 1, 2025, to January 1, 2027). These individuals will be treated as 'preference eligible' for competitive service appointments and will receive an additional 5 points added to their earned rating, making it easier for them to secure new federal employment.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal employees involuntarily removed between Jan 1, 2025, and Jan 1, 2027ImpactPositiveMechanismGrants 'preference eligible' status and 5 additional points on competitive service applications, increasing re-employment chances.ScaleIndividual, potentially affecting a significant number of employees if large-scale removals occur.
GroupOther job applicants for competitive service positionsImpactNegativeMechanismIncreases competition and potentially reduces their chances of selection due to the preference given to a specific group.ScaleIndividual, affecting all other applicants for relevant positions.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision provides a crucial safety net for experienced federal employees who might be unjustly removed, preserving institutional knowledge and protecting the non-partisan nature of the civil service. It ensures that valuable public servants can quickly return to service.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision creates an artificial advantage for a specific group, potentially undermining the principle of merit-based hiring by prioritizing past employment status over current qualifications or other forms of preference. It could also be seen as an overreach into agency hiring autonomy.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire to protect career civil servants and their expertise against the principle of open, merit-based competition for federal jobs. It also creates a temporary preference that could be seen as either a necessary safeguard or an undue advantage.

Section 2(b)

Exclusions and Expiration of Hiring Preference

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section outlines specific conditions under which the hiring preference does not apply, ensuring it is not abused. It excludes individuals removed from political positions, those separated due to clearly documented charges of misconduct or delinquency, and those separated with an unacceptable or less than fully successful performance review. Furthermore, the entire preference authority is temporary, set to expire five years after the bill's enactment.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this