The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 337·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 13, 2025

To provide technical and financial assistance for groundwater recharge, aquifer storage, and water source substitution projects.

IntroducedWater Resources DevelopmentSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 13, 2025

Bottom line

H.R. 337 provides dedicated funding from existing federal infrastructure balances to support water conservation and supply resilience projects.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) to allocate $3 million annually from existing unobligated balances for fiscal years 2026 through 2031. This funding is specifically designated for technical and financial assistance for groundwater recharge, aquifer storage, and water source substitution projects, which are already authorized under Section 40910(a) of the IIJA.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill provides crucial, consistent funding for projects vital to water security in regions facing drought and water scarcity. By utilizing unobligated balances, it ensures that existing federal resources are efficiently directed towards critical infrastructure without requiring new appropriations, thereby supporting sustainable water management practices and enhancing community resilience.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the projects are beneficial, reallocating unobligated balances from Section 40901 could potentially divert funds from other important infrastructure priorities originally intended under that section. There might also be concerns about the sufficiency of the allocated amount to address widespread water challenges or the administrative overhead associated with managing these specific grants.

The bill is extremely short and straightforward, allowing for quick comprehension of its provisions.

Section 1, amending Section 40910 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

Funding for Groundwater Recharge, Aquifer Storage, and Water Source Substitution Projects

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Secretary to make available $3,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2031. This money will come from existing unobligated funds previously authorized under Section 40901 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The purpose of these funds is to provide technical and financial assistance for projects that replenish groundwater, store water in underground aquifers, and substitute water sources to improve water supply resilience.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupStates, local governments, and water utilities in drought-prone regionsImpactReceive financial and technical assistanceMechanismGrants and support for eligible water projectsScaleDirect financial benefit of $3 million annually for 6 years, enabling project implementation
GroupCommunities reliant on groundwaterImpactImproved water security and resilienceMechanismIncreased capacity for groundwater recharge and aquifer storageScaleLong-term environmental and economic benefits through sustainable water management

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that dedicated funding for these projects is essential for addressing water scarcity and drought impacts, particularly in Western states. By leveraging existing unobligated funds, the bill ensures that critical water infrastructure projects can move forward, protecting agricultural productivity and municipal water supplies.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against funding for water conservation projects themselves. Potential concerns might revolve around the opportunity cost of reallocating funds from other IIJA priorities, or whether the amount is sufficient to make a significant impact across all eligible regions.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the need for specific water infrastructure funding with the broader allocation priorities of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. It prioritizes groundwater and aquifer projects by drawing from a general pool of unobligated funds, potentially reducing the pool available for other purposes under Section 40901.

FOUND

The bill's funding mechanism relies on "unobligated balances of amounts made available under section 40901" and is "to carry out subsection (a)" of Section 40910.

Section 1, referencing Section 40901 and Section 40910(a) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117-58)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to amend existing law by reference, assuming readers have access to the underlying statutes. It is not intentionally evasive.

Case for: Referencing existing law streamlines the legislative process, avoids redundancy, and ensures consistency with established federal programs and definitions.

Case against: For readers without immediate access to the referenced public law, the full context and implications of the funding source and project scope may not be immediately clear, requiring additional research.

Estimated impact: The funding is $3 million annually for 6 years, totaling $18 million, drawn from existing unobligated balances.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this