The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Dec 11, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The diff between v3 and v4 primarily involves an update to the attestation of the House Clerk and the addition of Senate referral information. No substantive policy changes were made to the bill text.

H.R. 3383·119th Congress·Introduced May 14, 2025

Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation Act of 2025

Passed HouseFinance and Financial SectorOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2]
Committees
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 15, 2025

Bottom line

The INVEST Act of 2025 is an omnibus bill designed to modernize and deregulate aspects of U.S. capital markets, aiming to boost small business financing and investor access while enhancing market efficiency.

What it actually does

This bill, known as the INVEST Act of 2025, makes wide-ranging amendments to federal securities laws, including the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It aims to expand access to capital for small businesses, increase investment opportunities for various investor types, and strengthen public markets through regulatory adjustments. Key changes include modifying definitions for 'accredited investor' and 'small entity,' streamlining disclosure requirements, and altering rules for venture capital funds and closed-end companies.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the bill will reduce regulatory burdens on small businesses, making it easier for them to raise capital and create jobs, especially in rural areas. They contend that expanding the definition of 'accredited investor' and allowing for an examination pathway will democratize access to private investment opportunities for financially sophisticated individuals. Furthermore, streamlining disclosure and allowing greater flexibility for investment vehicles like closed-end funds will enhance market efficiency and competitiveness, ultimately benefiting the economy.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that the bill's deregulation efforts, particularly around the 'accredited investor' definition and reduced disclosure requirements, could expose less sophisticated investors to undue risk in private markets. They may express concerns that expanding exemptions for venture capital funds and closed-end companies could lead to reduced transparency and oversight, potentially increasing systemic risk or creating opportunities for financial exploitation, especially for senior investors, despite the creation of a Senior Investor Taskforce.

The bill is extensive and highly technical, covering multiple complex areas of securities law. A thorough understanding requires significant time, likely exceeding what is typically available for public review of omnibus legislation.

Sec. 101, Title I

Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to include 'rural-area small businesses' alongside women-owned small businesses in provisions related to expanding access to capital. This aims to ensure that the unique challenges faced by businesses in rural areas are specifically considered in capital formation initiatives and reporting by the SEC's Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupRural-area small businessesImpactPositiveMechanismIncreased focus and potential for tailored capital formation initiatives from the SEC.ScalePotentially broad, depending on subsequent SEC actions.
GroupSEC's Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital FormationImpactOperational changeMechanismExpanded mandate to include rural-area small businesses in its advocacy and reporting.ScaleInternal operational adjustment.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that rural businesses often face unique challenges in accessing capital compared to their urban counterparts. Explicitly including them in the SEC's mandate ensures that their needs are addressed, fostering economic growth and job creation in underserved areas.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as it is seen as a targeted effort to support a specific demographic of small businesses without imposing new burdens.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is ensuring that the inclusion of 'rural-area small businesses' leads to concrete, effective support rather than just a symbolic gesture, without diverting resources excessively from other small business categories.

Sec. 102, Title I

Helping Angels Lead Our Startups (HALOS) Act

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section directs the SEC to revise Regulation D to exempt certain presentations or communications made at 'demo day' type events from the prohibition against general solicitation or general advertising. These events must be sponsored by specific types of entities (e.g., non-profits, angel investor groups, universities) and adhere to strict conditions, such as not advertising specific offerings, not charging excessive fees, and not making investment recommendations.

Sec. 103, Title I

Crowdfunding Capital Enhancement and Small-Business Support

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section increases the maximum amount an issuer can raise through crowdfunding offerings from $100,000 to $250,000 within a 12-month period for certain investors. It also grants the SEC discretion to further increase this amount up to $400,000 based on recommendations from the Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation and the Office of the Investor Advocate. Technical corrections are also made to cross-references in the Securities Act of 1933.

Sec. 104, Title I

Small Business Investor Capital Access (Investment Advisers Act)

buried in fine printstraightforward

This section amends the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to increase the assets under management (AUM) threshold for certain investment advisers to qualify for an exemption from SEC registration from $150,000,000 to $175,000,000. It also mandates that the SEC adjust this dollar amount every 5 years to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.

Sec. 105, Title I

Advocating for Small Business (SEC Offices)

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates the establishment of an 'Office of Small Business' within each of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Investment Management, and Division of Trading and Markets. These new offices are tasked with coordinating with the existing Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation on rules and policy priorities related to capital formation, without authorizing additional full-time equivalent employees.

Sec. 106, Title I

Small Entity Update (Regulatory Flexibility Act)

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section requires the SEC to conduct studies (initially within 1 year, then every 5 years) on its definition of 'small entity' for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The studies must consider alignment with the Act's findings, market growth, and how to appropriately define 'small entity' to expand coverage. Based on these studies, the SEC must submit reports to Congress with recommendations and then revise its rules. It also mandates inflation adjustments to any dollar figures in the small entity definition every 5 years.

Sec. 107, Title I

Improving Access to Small Business Information (Paperwork Reduction Act Exemption)

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exempt actions taken by the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation from most requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Specifically, it clarifies that the Advocate's information collection activities are not considered a 'collection of information' for PRA purposes, though certain transparency requirements (like public notice and comment) still apply, but without requiring OMB review or control numbers.

Sec. 108, Title I

Improving Capital Allocation for Newcomers (Venture Capital Funds)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 to increase the number of beneficial owners a qualifying venture capital fund can have from 250 to 500 persons, and raises the asset threshold for certain venture capital funds from $10,000,000 to $50,000,000. It also mandates a study by the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation and the Investor Advocate, 5 years after enactment, on the impact of these changes on capital distribution, socio-economic characteristics of founders, and veteran status. Based on the study's findings, the SEC may adjust these thresholds further within specified ranges.

Sec. 109, Title I

Developing and Empowering Our Aspiring Leaders (Venture Capital Fund Definition Refinement)

buried in fine printhighly complex

This section directs the SEC to revise the definition of a 'qualifying investment' for venture capital funds to include equity securities acquired in secondary acquisitions and investments in other venture capital funds. It also imposes a new condition for a private fund to qualify as a venture capital fund: immediately after acquiring any asset, the fund must hold no more than 49 percent of its aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital in a combination of other venture capital funds or qualifying investments acquired in secondary acquisitions.

Sec. 201, Title II

Fair Investment Opportunities for Professional Experts (Accredited Investor Definition)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section amends the definition of 'accredited investor' under the Securities Act of 1933. It retains the existing net worth and income thresholds (with inflation adjustments every 5 years) but clarifies how primary residence is treated in net worth calculations. Crucially, it adds new categories: natural persons licensed as brokers or investment advisers in good standing, and natural persons the SEC determines, by regulation, to have demonstrable education or job experience verified by a self-regulatory organization.

Sec. 202, Title II

Retirement Fairness for Charities and Educational Institutions

buried in fine printhighly complex

This section significantly amends the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Securities Act of 1933, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand exemptions for certain retirement plans, particularly those under Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. It clarifies that collective trust funds and separate accounts holding assets of these plans, including those for charities and educational institutions, can be excluded from the definition of an investment company, provided certain fiduciary review and approval conditions are met for investment alternatives.

Sec. 203, Title II

Equal Opportunity for All Investors (Accredited Investor Examination)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates the SEC to establish an examination (test, certification, or program) to certify individuals as 'accredited investors.' The examination must be designed to assess competency in various financial topics, including types of securities, disclosure requirements, corporate governance, financial statements, and risks associated with unregistered securities and private funds. This examination will be administered free of charge by a registered national securities association.

Sec. 204, Title II

Senior Security (Senior Investor Taskforce and GAO Study)

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes a Senior Investor Taskforce within the SEC, reporting directly to the Chairman, to identify challenges faced by senior investors, including financial exploitation and cognitive decline. The Taskforce will coordinate with other offices and agencies, and issue biennial reports to Congress with recommendations. It also mandates a GAO study on the economic costs, frequency, and policy responses to financial exploitation of senior citizens. The Taskforce will sunset after 10 years and use existing funds.

Sec. 205, Title II

Improving Disclosure for Investors (Electronic Delivery)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section directs the SEC to propose and finalize rules within one year to allow covered entities (investment companies, brokers, advisers, etc.) to satisfy regulatory document delivery obligations using electronic means. The rules must include provisions for initial paper communications, a transition period, annual opt-out notices, failed delivery remediation, and readability/retainability standards. If the SEC fails to act, covered entities can proceed with electronic delivery under specified conditions. It also exempts electronic delivery under this section from certain requirements of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act.

Sec. 206, Title II

Increasing Investor Opportunities (Closed-end Company Authority to Invest in Private Funds)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 to explicitly state that the SEC may not prohibit or limit a closed-end company (including business development companies) from investing any or all of its assets in securities issued by private funds. It also restricts the SEC and national securities exchanges from imposing conditions on the offer, sale, or listing of such closed-end companies' securities, unless the conditions are unrelated to the private fund investments themselves. It includes rules of construction to clarify that fiduciary duties and existing valuation/liquidity requirements for closed-end companies are not limited.

Sec. 301, Title III

Encouraging Local Emerging Ventures and Economic Growth (Confidential Draft Registration Statements for all Issuers)

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to allow *any* issuer (not just emerging growth companies) to confidentially submit a draft registration statement to the SEC for nonpublic review prior to public filing. The initial confidential submission and all amendments must be publicly filed at least 10 days before listing on a national securities exchange. It also clarifies that information provided under this provision is confidential and exempt from public disclosure under FOIA.

Sec. 302, Title III

Access to Small Business Investor Capital (Excluding BDCs from Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses)

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section allows registered investment companies to omit fees and expenses incurred indirectly from investing in business development companies (BDCs) when calculating 'Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses' in their fee table disclosures. This applies to various SEC forms (N-1A, N-2, N-3) used by different types of investment companies.

Sec. 303, Title III

Encouraging Public Offerings (Expanding 'Testing the Waters' and Confidential Review)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section expands the 'testing the waters' provision (allowing pre-filing communications with qualified institutional buyers and accredited investors) from only emerging growth companies (EGCs) to *all* issuers. It also broadens the confidential review of draft registration statements to all issuers for initial public offerings, initial registrations, and follow-on offerings, with specific public filing deadlines before effectiveness or listing. The SEC may impose additional terms and conditions through rulemaking, but must report findings to Congress first.

Sec. 304, Title III

Greenlighting Growth (Acquired Company Financial Statements for EGCs)

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section amends the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to clarify that an emerging growth company (EGC) is not required to present acquired company financial statements or information for any period prior to the earliest audited period of the EGC presented in connection with its initial public offering (IPO). This relief also applies to former EGCs for periods prior to their IPO's earliest audited period, reducing the burden of historical financial reporting for acquired entities.

Sec. 305, Title III

Middle Market IPO Cost Study

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates the Comptroller General of the United States, in consultation with the SEC and FINRA, to conduct a study on the costs associated with small- and medium-sized companies undertaking initial public offerings (IPOs). The study must analyze direct and indirect costs (e.g., fees, compliance), compare IPO costs to alternative financing, assess impact on capital formation and retail investor access, and analyze IPO trends over time, including underwriting practices, investment research, and litigation costs. A report with findings and recommendations is due to Congress within 360 days.

Sec. 306, Title III

Expanding WKSI Eligibility

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section expands the definition of a 'well-known seasoned issuer' (WKSI) for federal securities laws. An issuer now qualifies as a WKSI if the aggregate market value of its voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates is $400,000,000 or more (down from $700,000,000), provided it meets all other WKSI requirements. It also requires the SEC to publish the number of withdrawn applications for WKSI status where the applicant sought a determination not to be considered an ineligible issuer.

Sec. 307, Title III

Enhancing Multi-class Share Disclosures

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require the SEC to promulgate rules mandating enhanced disclosures for issuers with multi-class share structures. In proxy or consent solicitation materials for annual meetings (or other appropriate filings), these issuers must disclose, for each director, director nominee, named executive officer, or 5%+ beneficial owner, the number of shares and total voting power held, expressed as a percentage of total outstanding voting securities.

FOUND

Exemption of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation's information collection from most Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requirements.

Sec. 107(10), Title I

Why it matters:The partial exemption from the PRA is a technical legislative maneuver to streamline the Advocate's operations. While it retains some transparency requirements, the exemption from OMB review and control numbers is a significant procedural change that could be seen as both efficiency-driven and potentially evasive of full PRA scrutiny.

Case for: Supporters argue that the PRA's bureaucratic requirements can impede the Advocate's ability to quickly gather feedback from small businesses, making it less responsive. This exemption allows for more agile and timely information gathering, ultimately benefiting small business advocacy.

Case against: Critics might argue that even partial exemptions from the PRA reduce transparency and accountability in government information collection. The PRA is designed to prevent undue burdens on the public and ensure proper oversight of federal data requests, and bypassing parts of it could set a precedent.

Estimated impact: Streamlines information gathering for the SEC's Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation, potentially increasing the speed and volume of small business feedback, but reduces external oversight of these collection efforts.

FOUND

Amendment to Section 3(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 to include subparagraph (C) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) and (7)(D) for investment limitation calculations.

Sec. 206(d), Title II

Why it matters:This is a highly technical, conforming amendment to ensure consistency in how investment limitations are calculated for certain funds, likely correcting an oversight or aligning with other changes. Its technical nature makes it inherently buried.

Case for: Supporters would argue this is a necessary technical correction to ensure the Investment Company Act's provisions are internally consistent and accurately reflect the intended scope of investment limitations, preventing unintended regulatory consequences.

Case against: No specific opposition would be raised against a technical correction of this nature, as it is intended to clarify existing law rather than introduce new policy.

Estimated impact: Ensures proper calculation of investment limitations for certain funds under the Investment Company Act, preventing potential misinterpretations or unintended regulatory burdens.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency
Ask Ledger AI about this