The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3385·119th Congress·Introduced May 14, 2025

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue certain regulations to update the definition of motorcycle, and for other purposes.

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 10, 2026

Bottom line

H.R. 3385 mandates a specific, updated federal definition for "motorcycle" to clarify regulatory scope and potentially address emerging vehicle types.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of Transportation to update the federal definition of "motorcycle" in section 571.3 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, within 120 days of enactment. The new definition specifies a motor vehicle, as originally manufactured, with motive power, a seat requiring astride riding, designed for not more than three wheels, handlebar steering, handlebar and foot controls for acceleration/braking, and capable of speeds over 30 mph. This aims to standardize the definition for regulatory purposes.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that updating the federal definition of "motorcycle" is necessary to provide clarity and consistency for manufacturers, regulators, and consumers, especially given the evolution of vehicle designs like three-wheeled motorcycles. A clear, standardized definition can ensure appropriate safety standards are applied and reduce ambiguity in classification, promoting both safety and innovation within the industry.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while definitional updates can be useful, this specific definition could inadvertently exclude certain niche vehicle types or create new regulatory burdens. They might also argue that the Department of Transportation already has the authority to update definitions through its rulemaking process, and a legislative mandate might be an overreach or unnecessary intervention in an administrative function, potentially limiting future flexibility.

The bill is extremely short and straightforward, making it very accessible for a quick read and understanding of its core purpose.

Section 1(a) and 1(b)

Amendment to Federal Definition of "Motorcycle"

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of Transportation revise the definition of "motorcycle" in federal regulations (49 CFR 571.3) within 120 days. The new definition specifies a motorcycle as a motor vehicle, as originally manufactured, with motive power, a seat for astride riding, designed for up to three wheels, handlebar steering, handlebar and foot controls, and capable of exceeding 30 mph. This aims to standardize the federal understanding of what constitutes a motorcycle for regulatory purposes.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMotorcycle manufacturersImpactRegulatory clarity and compliance requirementsMechanismNew definition provides specific criteria for vehicle classification, potentially impacting design and safety standards application.ScaleIndustry-wide, affecting all manufacturers producing vehicles that fall under or near the "motorcycle" classification.
GroupFederal regulators (Department of Transportation, NHTSA)ImpactMandated regulatory action and clarified scope of authorityMechanismSecretary is directed to issue new regulations, streamlining the definitional aspect of their work.ScaleDirect impact on regulatory processes and enforcement.
GroupConsumers of motorcycles and similar vehiclesImpactPotential impact on vehicle classification, safety standards, and insuranceMechanismA clearer definition might lead to more consistent application of safety rules, affecting vehicle features and potentially insurance rates.ScaleBroad, affecting anyone purchasing or operating a vehicle classified as a motorcycle.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a precise and updated definition is crucial for regulatory consistency, ensuring that all vehicles intended as motorcycles are subject to appropriate safety standards, regardless of evolving designs (e.g., three-wheeled models). This clarity benefits manufacturers by providing clear guidelines and consumers through enhanced safety.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that legislating a specific definition could limit the Department of Transportation's flexibility to adapt to future technological advancements or unique vehicle designs without further congressional action. They might also raise concerns that the "as originally manufactured" clause could create issues for modified vehicles or custom builds.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the need for regulatory clarity and standardization with the potential for limiting future administrative flexibility in adapting to new vehicle technologies or unforeseen design innovations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this