The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Sep 15, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The legislative text of H.R. 3427 remains identical between v3 and v4, with changes limited to procedural notations indicating the bill's passage from the House to the Senate and an updated attestation signature. No substantive policy changes were made.

H.R. 3427·119th Congress·Introduced May 15, 2025

Water Resources Technical Assistance Review Act

Passed HouseEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Taylor, David J. [R-OH-2]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 16, 2025

Bottom line

The bill requires a comprehensive GAO review of EPA's clean water technical assistance programs to improve efficiency and accountability, with subsequent EPA action plans.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) to conduct a comprehensive review of all clean water-related technical assistance programs and initiatives administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The review will assess the scope, effectiveness, and potential duplication of these programs, particularly focusing on how assistance is provided to States, Tribes, local governments, non-governmental organizations, and economically distressed communities. Following the GAO report, the EPA Administrator must submit annual plans for five years detailing actions taken to comply with the recommendations.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will enhance transparency and accountability in how federal resources are allocated for clean water technical assistance. By requiring a thorough review, the legislation aims to identify inefficiencies, eliminate duplication, and ensure that technical assistance effectively reaches communities most in need, especially economically distressed ones, thereby maximizing the impact of federal investments in water infrastructure.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while oversight is valuable, the extensive reporting requirements placed on both the GAO and EPA could divert significant administrative resources and personnel away from direct program implementation and technical assistance delivery. They might argue that existing oversight mechanisms are sufficient or that the administrative burden outweighs the potential benefits, potentially slowing down critical support to communities.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its core purpose and provisions quickly.

Section 2(a) and 2(e)

Mandate for GAO Review of Clean Water Technical Assistance

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) to initiate a comprehensive review of all technical assistance programs, initiatives, and authorities related to clean water infrastructure administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This review must begin within one year of the bill's enactment and aims to provide a detailed understanding of the current landscape of EPA's clean water technical assistance.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupComptroller General of the United States (GAO)ImpactIncreased workload and responsibilityMechanismDirect legislative mandate to conduct a comprehensive review.ScaleSignificant for GAO's environmental oversight division.
GroupEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)ImpactSubject to review and scrutinyMechanismEPA programs and initiatives will be the subject of the GAO's comprehensive review.ScaleAgency-wide impact on clean water programs.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that a mandated GAO review ensures independent and objective assessment of EPA's technical assistance programs, which is crucial for identifying areas of improvement and ensuring accountability in federal spending.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the concept of independent oversight, though some might express concerns about the potential for the review process to be overly burdensome or to divert resources from ongoing program activities.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is between the desire for robust oversight and the potential for administrative burden on the agencies involved. While oversight is beneficial, the resources dedicated to the review could otherwise be used for direct program delivery.

Section 2(b)

Detailed Requirements for GAO Review Content

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section outlines the specific elements that the GAO's comprehensive review must include. These requirements range from describing existing technical assistance programs, their beneficiaries, and activities over the past five years, to a detailed examination of EPA's Water Technical Assistance (WaterTA) initiative. It also mandates an analysis of potential duplication, an evaluation of capacity building, an assessment of unmet needs in economically distressed communities, and a review of inter-agency coordination and the promotion of cost-effective technologies.

Section 2(c) and 2(d)

GAO Report and EPA Compliance Plan

prominently featuredstraightforward

Upon completing its review, the GAO is required to submit a report detailing its findings and recommendations to specific committees in both the House and Senate. Following this, the EPA Administrator must, within 90 days and then annually for five years, submit a plan outlining the actions taken to comply with the GAO's recommendations. This ensures that the GAO's findings lead to concrete changes and that EPA is held accountable for implementing improvements.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this