The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Jan 20, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The diff between v3 and v4 primarily reflects administrative updates related to the bill's procedural journey, specifically the Clerk's attestation and Senate referral information. No substantive policy changes were made to the bill's text.

H.R. 3496·119th Congress·Introduced May 19, 2025

Northern Mariana Islands Small Business Access Act

Passed HouseCommerceSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Del. King-Hinds, Kimberlyn [R-MP-At Large]
Committees
Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 26, 2026

Bottom line

This bill extends federal microloan access to small businesses and entrepreneurs in the Northern Mariana Islands, aiming to stimulate economic development in the territory.

What it actually does

This bill expands eligibility for the Small Business Administration's (SBA) microloan program to include the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). It achieves this by amending the Small Business Act to explicitly list CNMI alongside other U.S. territories and by making a corresponding technical adjustment to a fractional calculation related to the number of eligible jurisdictions.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill provides crucial access to capital for small businesses in the CNMI, fostering economic growth, job creation, and entrepreneurship in a region that may have limited traditional lending options. They emphasize the importance of equitable access to federal programs for all U.S. territories.

Opponents contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against expanding federal program eligibility to U.S. territories, especially for microloan programs which are generally seen as beneficial for small business development. Potential concerns, if any, might relate to the overall cost of expanding federal programs or administrative complexities, but these are unlikely to be significant for a microloan program expansion.

The bill is very short and straightforward, easily readable and understandable by any interested party within a minute, making it highly accessible.

Section 2(a)(1)

Extends Microloan Program Eligibility to Northern Mariana Islands

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Small Business Act to explicitly include the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) as an eligible jurisdiction for the Small Business Administration's (SBA) microloan program. This means that small businesses and entrepreneurs in the CNMI will now be able to access microloans, which are small, short-term loans provided by non-profit community-based lenders with technical assistance.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSmall businesses and entrepreneurs in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana IslandsImpactIncreased access to capital and technical assistanceMechanismDirect eligibility for SBA microloan programScalePotentially significant for individual small businesses, but overall federal budget impact is likely small.
GroupMicroloan intermediaries (non-profit lenders)ImpactExpanded service area and potential for new lending opportunitiesMechanismAbility to operate and lend in CNMIScaleModest expansion of operations.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that extending microloan eligibility to the CNMI addresses a critical need for capital in the territory, stimulating local economies, fostering entrepreneurship, and creating jobs. They emphasize that this ensures equitable access to federal support for all U.S. territories.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as it is seen as a beneficial expansion of an existing program to a U.S. territory. Any general concerns about federal spending or program administration would likely be minor in this context.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff is the modest increase in federal administrative burden and potential loan guarantees versus the economic development benefits for the CNMI. This is generally considered a favorable tradeoff by policymakers.

FOUND

Amends a fractional value from "\1/55\" to "\1/56\" within the Small Business Act's microloan program section. This adjustment is necessary to reflect the inclusion of an additional eligible jurisdiction (CNMI), ensuring the correct proportional calculation for program administration or funding distribution among the now 56 entities (50 states, DC, Puerto Rico, Guam, USVI, American Samoa, and CNMI).

Section 2(a)(2)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for making necessary mathematical adjustments when adding an entity to a list that involves proportional distribution. It's a technical correction rather than an attempt to obscure.

Case for: This technical amendment is essential for the proper functioning and mathematical integrity of the microloan program after adding the CNMI. Without it, the proportional distribution or calculation would be incorrect.

Case against: There is no substantive case against this technical adjustment, as it merely ensures the program operates correctly with the new inclusion.

Estimated impact: Ensures accurate allocation of microloan program resources across all eligible jurisdictions, including the newly added CNMI.

FOUND

Amends Section 7(m)(11)(C)(ii) of the Small Business Act by striking "rural" and all that follows through the end of the clause and inserting "rural; and". This appears to be a minor grammatical or structural cleanup within the definition of "rural" for the microloan program.

Section 2(b)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative drafting to correct or clarify statutory language, likely a grammatical or formatting fix. It is not intended to be evasive.

Case for: Ensures clarity and correct statutory language within the Small Business Act, preventing potential misinterpretations or awkward phrasing in the future.

Case against: There is no substantive case against this technical amendment; it is a routine legislative cleanup.

Estimated impact: No direct programmatic or fiscal impact; purely linguistic or structural.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this