The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3505·119th Congress·Introduced May 20, 2025

Barriers to Suicide Act of 2025

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
May 20, 2025

Bottom line

The bill establishes a federal grant program and clarifies existing highway funding eligibility to support the installation of physical suicide deterrents on high-risk infrastructure, aiming to reduce suicides by limiting access to means.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish a grant program to fund the installation of evidence-based suicide deterrents, such as nets and barriers, on various types of infrastructure including bridges, buildings, and rail stations. It also amends federal highway law to explicitly allow the use of existing highway funds for safety barriers and nets on bridges of the National Highway System. Additionally, the bill mandates a study by the Comptroller General on the effectiveness of suicide prevention measures for structures other than bridges.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will save lives by providing crucial federal resources for implementing proven suicide prevention methods on public infrastructure, particularly in areas with high suicide rates. They emphasize that physical deterrents are an effective, evidence-based strategy to prevent suicide attempts at known high-risk locations, complementing broader mental health initiatives.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the bill's objective is commendable, the authorized funding levels are modest relative to the national scale of the problem, potentially limiting its widespread impact. Some may also raise concerns about the aesthetic implications of installing extensive barriers or argue that the focus on physical deterrents, while important, should not overshadow the need for increased investment in mental health services.

The bill is short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core provisions and implications within a short timeframe.

Section 2

Establishment of a Grant Program for Suicide Deterrents

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish a competitive grant program within one year of the bill's enactment. The program will provide funding for the installation of evidence-based suicide deterrents, including nets and barriers, on covered locations such as bridges, buildings, parking garages, highway-rail grade crossings, and rail stations. States, political subdivisions, and other eligible entities can apply, with priority given to projects in areas with high suicide rates. The federal share of project costs may not exceed 80 percent, and $10 million is authorized for appropriation annually from fiscal years 2026 through 2030.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupStates, local governments, and other infrastructure ownersImpactReceive federal funding to implement suicide prevention projects on their infrastructure.MechanismCompetitive grants from the Department of Transportation.ScaleUp to $10 million annually for five years, distributed to eligible applicants.
GroupIndividuals at risk of suicideImpactIncreased safety and reduced access to means for suicide attempts at high-risk public locations.MechanismInstallation of physical deterrents like nets and barriers.ScaleLocalized impact at specific covered locations where deterrents are installed.
GroupCommunities surrounding covered locationsImpactPotential reduction in suicide rates and improved public safety, with possible aesthetic changes to infrastructure.MechanismImplementation of suicide prevention infrastructure projects.ScaleLocalized impact on community well-being and visual environment.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this program directly addresses a critical public health issue by providing much-needed federal resources for proven suicide prevention infrastructure, especially in high-risk areas. It empowers local entities to implement life-saving measures that might otherwise be cost-prohibitive.

Critics contend

Some might argue that the authorized funding, while helpful, is relatively small compared to the widespread need for such installations across the country, potentially leading to limited overall impact. Others might suggest that it represents an expansion of federal involvement into areas traditionally managed by state and local budgets.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the urgent need for suicide prevention with the financial and logistical challenges of implementing physical deterrents. It also navigates the tension between federal support and local autonomy in infrastructure decisions.

Section 3

Inclusion of Safety Barriers and Nets on Bridges in Highway System Funding

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section amends Section 119(d)(2)(I) of Title 23, United States Code, which pertains to the National Highway System. The amendment explicitly states that the installation of safety barriers and nets on bridges of the National Highway System is an eligible activity for funding under this existing federal highway program. This clarifies that states can use their allocated federal highway funds for suicide prevention infrastructure on bridges.

Section 4

GAO Study on Suicide Prevention Deterrents Beyond Bridges

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section directs the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) to conduct a study within one year of the bill's enactment. The study will identify types of structures, other than bridges, that attract a high number of suicide-by-jumping attempts, their distinguishing characteristics, effective types of nets or barriers (including natural barriers), other prevention methods, quantitative measures of effectiveness for these methods, typical installers, and associated costs. A report on the study's results will be submitted to relevant committees in both the House and Senate.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this