The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
3 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Mar 24, 2025)

Technical corrections only. v3 includes the name of the Clerk of the House and reflects the bill's referral to the Senate, which are procedural updates. There are no substantive policy changes between v2 and v3.

H.R. 359·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 13, 2025

Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025

Passed HouseEnergySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 25, 2025

Bottom line

This bill enhances transparency and congressional oversight regarding the Department of Energy's use of waivers for cost-sharing requirements in energy projects by mandating regular public reporting.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to mandate new reporting requirements for the Department of Energy (DOE). Specifically, it requires the Secretary of Energy to submit quarterly reports to designated congressional committees and make these reports publicly available. These reports must detail all instances where the DOE has used its authority to reduce or eliminate cost-sharing requirements for projects.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill enhances congressional oversight and public transparency over federal spending and project management within the Department of Energy. It ensures that decisions to waive cost-sharing requirements, which can impact taxpayer funds and project equity, are regularly reviewed and justified, promoting greater accountability in federal energy investments.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that this bill adds an administrative burden to the Department of Energy, potentially diverting resources from core energy research and development activities to reporting tasks. They might also contend that existing oversight mechanisms are sufficient, and this new requirement is redundant or overly prescriptive, potentially slowing down project approvals.

The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for immediate understanding by any reader.

Section 2, amending Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16352)

Quarterly Reporting on Cost-Share Waivers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of Energy must, within 120 days of the bill's enactment and then quarterly thereafter, provide reports to specific congressional committees. These committees include the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the House Committee on Appropriations, the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Senate Committee on Appropriations. The reports must detail the Department of Energy's use of its authority to reduce or eliminate cost-sharing requirements for projects, as permitted under existing law (subsection (b)(3) or (c)(2) of 42 U.S.C. 16352). Crucially, these reports must also be made publicly available.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of Energy (DOE)ImpactIncreased administrative burden due to new, ongoing reporting requirements.MechanismMandated quarterly compilation and submission of data on cost-share waivers to Congress and the public.ScaleOngoing, moderate administrative impact on DOE resources.
GroupCongressional Committees (House Science, Space, and Technology; House Appropriations; Senate Energy and Natural Resources; Senate Appropriations)ImpactEnhanced oversight capabilities and access to detailed information.MechanismRegular receipt of comprehensive reports on DOE's cost-share waiver decisions.ScaleImproved information flow for legislative and budgetary oversight.
GroupPublic and TaxpayersImpactGreater transparency regarding federal energy project funding and the use of taxpayer dollars.MechanismPublic availability of reports detailing instances and justifications for cost-share waivers.ScaleIncreased public accountability of federal spending.
GroupEntities receiving DOE funding with cost-share waiversImpactIncreased scrutiny of their funding arrangements and the rationale behind waivers.MechanismDetails of their waiver will be included in publicly accessible reports, potentially leading to greater public and congressional examination.ScaleIndirect impact on perception and accountability for funded projects.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is crucial for ensuring accountability in federal spending. By requiring regular, public reporting on cost-share waivers, Congress and the public can better understand how taxpayer funds are being utilized and whether exceptions to standard funding rules are justified and applied equitably. This transparency can prevent potential misuse or favoritism in project funding and build public trust.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that while transparency is generally desirable, this specific reporting requirement could create an unnecessary bureaucratic hurdle for the Department of Energy. They might argue that the existing authority to waive cost-sharing is intended to provide flexibility for critical projects, and excessive reporting could slow down project approvals or discourage the use of these waivers even when beneficial for innovation.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire for increased transparency and congressional oversight with the potential for increased administrative burden on the Department of Energy. It also navigates the tension between providing necessary flexibility for project funding through waivers and ensuring robust accountability for those exceptions, which could impact the speed and agility of federal energy initiatives.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this