The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3601·119th Congress·Introduced May 23, 2025

National ACERT Grant Program Authorization Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
May 23, 2025

Bottom line

This bill authorizes $10 million annually for four years to fund local programs aimed at improving responses to children exposed to trauma by fostering collaboration between emergency responders, health services, and community partners.

What it actually does

This bill establishes the Adverse Childhood Experiences Response Team (ACERT) grant program under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. It authorizes the Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to make grants to States, local governments, Indian Tribes, and community organizations. These grants are intended to fund the creation of ACERTs, which will integrate law enforcement, mental health, and crisis services to support children exposed to trauma, facilitate access to services, and provide trauma-informed training.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill provides crucial federal funding to address the long-term impacts of childhood trauma by enabling communities to develop integrated, trauma-informed response systems. They believe that early intervention and coordinated care can significantly improve outcomes for children, reduce future societal costs associated with unaddressed trauma, and enhance public safety by addressing root causes of distress.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the bill's intent is laudable, the authorized funding level is insufficient to make a widespread, national impact, potentially leading to a patchwork of services rather than comprehensive change. Some may also raise concerns about the scope of federal involvement in local service provision or the potential for administrative burdens associated with grant applications and reporting requirements.

The bill is very concise and can be easily understood by an informed reader in a short amount of time, making it highly accessible for public review.

Section 2, adding Section 3051(a) to Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968

Establishment of the National ACERT Grant Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to award grants. These grants are specifically for States, units of local government, Indian Tribes, and neighborhood or community-based organizations. The purpose of these grants is to address adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that are associated with exposure to trauma.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupStates, units of local government, Indian Tribes, and community-based organizationsImpactEligible to receive federal funding to establish and operate trauma response programs.MechanismDirect grant funding from the federal government.ScalePotentially significant for recipient entities, enabling new programs or expansion of existing ones.
GroupChildren and youth exposed to traumaImpactIndirectly benefit from improved access to services and more coordinated responses.MechanismEnhanced local infrastructure and trained personnel to address trauma.ScalePositive impact on well-being and long-term outcomes for affected individuals in recipient communities.

Supporters argue

Supporters contend that federal funding is essential to catalyze and support local efforts to combat the pervasive issue of childhood trauma, which has significant public health and safety implications. They argue that a national grant program ensures a consistent framework while allowing for local adaptation.

Critics contend

Some might argue that such programs are best funded and managed at the state or local level without federal intervention, or that the federal government should prioritize other areas of crime control. Concerns could also be raised about potential federal overreach into local service delivery.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire for federal support and guidance on a national issue with the need for local flexibility in implementation, acknowledging that trauma responses must be tailored to specific community needs.

Section 2, adding Section 3051(b) to Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968

Authorized Uses of Grant Funds

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section details how the grant money can be used by recipients. It includes establishing protocols for responding to children exposed to trauma, creating referral partnerships with behavioral health and substance treatment providers, integrating law enforcement with mental health services, implementing comprehensive support programs, identifying barriers to trauma-informed care, providing training to various emergency and service providers, supporting cross-system collaboration among different agencies, and offering technical assistance on trauma prevention and mitigation.

Section 2, adding Section 3051(d) to Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968

Authorization of Appropriations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the appropriation of $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2026 through 2029 to fund the Adverse Childhood Experiences Response Team grant program. This means that Congress is permitted to allocate this amount of money, but it does not automatically appropriate the funds; a separate appropriations act would be required.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this