The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3623·119th Congress·Introduced May 29, 2025

Horse Transportation Safety Act of 2025

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
May 30, 2025

Bottom line

This bill aims to enhance horse welfare during interstate transportation by banning the use of double-deck trailers and imposing fines for non-compliance.

What it actually does

This bill amends title 49, United States Code, to explicitly prohibit the transportation of horses in interstate commerce using motor vehicles that have two or more levels stacked on top of each other. It also establishes civil penalties for any person who knowingly violates this prohibition, with fines ranging from $100 to $500 for each horse transported in violation.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that double-deck trailers are inherently inhumane for horses, leading to inadequate headroom, poor ventilation, and a significantly increased risk of injury, stress, and even death during long-distance transport. They contend that this prohibition is a crucial step towards ensuring safer and more ethical conditions for horses in transit.

Opponents contend

Potential opponents, particularly within segments of the livestock transportation or equine industries, might argue that such a ban could lead to increased operational costs and logistical challenges for transporters and horse owners. They may suggest that existing regulations or industry practices are sufficient, or that the economic burden of transitioning to single-deck trailers outweighs the perceived welfare benefits.

The bill is concise and easily digestible, allowing readers to quickly grasp its core provisions and implications.

Section 2(3) and Section 2(4)(A) of the bill, amending 49 U.S.C. 80502(d) and (e)

Prohibition on Multilevel Horse Transportation and Associated Penalties

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision makes it illegal for any person to transport, or cause to be transported, a horse across state lines in a motor vehicle containing two or more levels stacked on top of each other. It further stipulates that a person knowingly violating this prohibition is liable for a civil penalty of at least $100 but not more than $500 for each horse transported in violation. This penalty is in addition to any other legal remedies.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupHorse owners and transportersImpactIncreased compliance burden, potential changes in transportation methods, potential financial penalties for non-compliance.MechanismDirect prohibition and civil penalties.ScaleNational, affecting all interstate horse transport.
GroupHorsesImpactImproved welfare and safety during interstate transportation by eliminating a specific type of hazardous transport vehicle.MechanismElimination of a specific type of hazardous transport vehicle.ScaleAffects all horses transported interstate.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that multilevel trailers are inherently unsafe and cruel for horses, leading to injuries, stress, and even death due to inadequate space and ventilation. Banning them would significantly enhance animal welfare during long-distance transport by ensuring horses are transported in more appropriate conditions.

Critics contend

Some in the livestock transportation industry or horse racing industry might argue that such a ban could increase operational costs and logistical challenges, potentially leading to higher prices for horse transport services or reduced efficiency. They might also contend that existing regulations or industry best practices are sufficient to ensure horse safety.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances animal welfare concerns against potential economic impacts on the horse transportation industry and horse owners. It aims to eliminate a specific perceived risk to horses, which may come at the cost of increased operational expenses for transporters who currently use or would otherwise use multilevel vehicles.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this