The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Jul 20, 2026)

Technical and administrative changes only. The later version (v4) updates the name of the Attesting Clerk from "Clerk" to "KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, Clerk" in the House-passed attestation. No substantive policy changes were made to the bill text between v3 and v4.

H.R. 3747·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 5, 2025

Accelerating Access to Dementia and Alzheimer’s Provider Training Act

Passed HouseHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 21, 2026

Bottom line

The AADAPT Act extends funding authority for a federal health program and directs it to address the growing need for specialized dementia care training.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes the Project ECHO Grant Program under the Public Health Service Act for fiscal years 2027 through 2031. It expands the program's scope to explicitly include 'dementia care' as an area for which grants can be used to disseminate knowledge and build capacity. Additionally, it clarifies that public or nonprofit private entities are eligible to receive these grants.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for addressing the increasing prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias by expanding access to specialized training for healthcare providers, especially in underserved areas. They contend that Project ECHO's tele-mentoring model is an effective and efficient way to disseminate best practices and build capacity without requiring providers to leave their communities.

Opponents contend

Critics, if any, might argue that while the intent is good, reauthorizing programs without thorough re-evaluation of their effectiveness could lead to inefficient spending. Some might also contend that focusing on specific diseases like dementia could divert resources from broader public health initiatives or that other funding mechanisms might be more appropriate for this type of training.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions and implications quickly.

Section 2(b)

Reauthorization of Project ECHO Grant Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision extends the authorization for appropriations for the Project ECHO Grant Program. Instead of expiring in fiscal year 2026, the program is now authorized to receive funding through fiscal years 2027 to 2031. This ensures the continued existence and potential funding of the program for an additional five years.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal agencies (HHS)ImpactContinues authority to award grantsMechanismExtension of appropriations authorizationScaleProgrammatic
GroupHealthcare providers and institutionsImpactContinued access to grant funding for training and capacity buildingMechanismAvailability of Project ECHO grantsScaleNational

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that reauthorizing Project ECHO is essential to maintain a proven model for expanding access to specialized medical knowledge, particularly in rural and underserved communities. They highlight its cost-effectiveness in building local healthcare capacity.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the reauthorization of a generally well-regarded program like Project ECHO, unless it is part of a broader debate on federal spending priorities or program effectiveness.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff is between continued investment in an established program and the opportunity cost of potentially allocating those funds to new or different health initiatives. However, given the program's track record, this is often seen as a low-risk reauthorization.

Section 2(a)(2)

Expansion of Project ECHO Scope to Include Dementia Care

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Public Health Service Act to explicitly add 'dementia care' to the list of areas for which Project ECHO grants can be used. This means that federal grants under this program can now be specifically directed towards disseminating knowledge and building capacity among healthcare providers to better address Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

Section 2(a)(1)

Clarification of Eligible Entities for Grants

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision clarifies the types of entities eligible for Project ECHO grants. It amends the language to explicitly state that 'public or nonprofit private entities' are included among those eligible to receive grants. This ensures that a broad range of organizations, including government agencies and non-profit organizations, can apply for and receive funding.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this