The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3923·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 11, 2025

Wildfire Coordination Act

IntroducedScience, Technology, CommunicationsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]
Committees
Science, Space, and Technology Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 11, 2025

Bottom line

This bill creates a permanent federal advisory board to enhance the translation of wildfire science into practical operational strategies and foster collaboration among diverse entities involved in wildfire management.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to establish a permanent Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board. The Board's primary functions are to coordinate the operationalization of wildfire research within the Federal Government, encourage interdisciplinary approaches to wildfire science, and disseminate research findings and best practices to relevant stakeholders. It specifies a broad membership including federal officials and non-federal experts.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for improving the effectiveness of wildfire management by ensuring that the latest scientific research is quickly and efficiently integrated into federal operations. They highlight the need for better coordination among diverse agencies and stakeholders, emphasizing that a dedicated board can bridge the gap between research and practice, leading to more informed decision-making and better outcomes in wildfire prevention, response, and recovery. The inclusion of diverse experts, including public health and meteorological scientists, is seen as a strength, promoting a holistic approach to wildfire challenges.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that establishing another advisory board could add bureaucracy without guaranteeing significant improvements, potentially duplicating efforts of existing interagency groups or research initiatives. They might contend that the authorized funding of $10 million, while seemingly modest, could be better spent directly on firefighting resources, land management, or existing research programs. Concerns could also be raised about the board's actual authority to enforce recommendations or the potential for political appointees to dilute scientific independence.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Establishment of the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section directs the Secretary of the Interior to create a permanent advisory committee to be known as the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board. This board is intended to serve as a central coordinating body for wildfire-related science and technology efforts across the federal government and with external partners, ensuring a sustained focus on integrating research into practice.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal Government agencies (e.g., Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, FEMA)ImpactRequires establishment of a new permanent advisory body and participation from various agencies.MechanismStatutory directive.ScaleBroad, affecting multiple federal departments and their wildfire-related activities.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a permanent, statutorily mandated board ensures sustained focus and coordination on wildfire science, preventing efforts from being siloed or deprioritized due to changing administrations or agency leadership, thereby providing long-term stability for critical research integration.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that existing interagency working groups or task forces could achieve similar coordination without the overhead of establishing a new permanent board, potentially leading to bureaucratic bloat and redundant efforts.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire for dedicated, permanent coordination to address a critical national issue versus the potential for creating another layer of bureaucracy that might overlap with existing structures or prove inefficient.

Section 2(b)

Duties of the Board: Coordination, Encouragement, and Dissemination

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section outlines the core functions of the Board: coordinating the translation of wildfire research into practical applications, encouraging the inclusion of diverse disciplines (like public health and meteorology) and consideration of built/natural environments in wildfire operations, and disseminating research findings and best practices to stakeholders through various mechanisms such as newsletters, online portals, webinars, and workshops.

Section 2(c) and 2(f)

Board Membership Structure and Financial Resources

prominently featuredstraightforward

Section 2(c) details the composition of the Board, including 18 federal officials (or their designees) from various departments and agencies, and up to 18 non-federal members appointed by the Secretary of the Interior, representing state, local, and tribal governments, fire departments, private sector, researchers, and experts in various fields. Section 2(f) authorizes $10,000,000 in appropriations for the board's activities, to remain available until expended, and allows federal members to use existing agency funds for their participation.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this