The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 3991·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 12, 2025

Research for Healthy Soils Act

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 12, 2025

Bottom line

This bill expands federal agricultural research priorities to address emerging contaminants in farmland and extends funding authorization for related initiatives, aiming to improve soil health and food safety.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to designate research on microplastics and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on farmland as a high-priority research and extension area. It outlines specific research activities, including data collection, development of filtering techniques, impact analysis on crops and soil, and remediation methods. Additionally, the bill reauthorizes existing high-priority research and extension initiatives through fiscal year 2031.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this legislation is crucial for addressing a critical and growing environmental concern that impacts food safety, soil health, and agricultural sustainability. They contend that proactive research is essential to understand, mitigate, and remediate the widespread presence of microplastics and PFAS in agricultural lands, ensuring the long-term viability of farming and protecting public health.

Opponents contend

While direct opposition to research on environmental contaminants is uncommon, critics might express concerns that adding new specific research areas could potentially dilute resources from existing high-priority initiatives without a corresponding increase in overall funding. Some might also be wary of potential future regulations that could arise from research findings, which might impose new burdens on farmers or wastewater treatment facilities.

The bill is very short and clearly written, allowing for a quick and thorough understanding of its provisions within the time typically allotted for review.

Section 2, amending 7 U.S.C. 5925(d)

Inclusion of Microplastics and PFAS Research on Farmland

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision expands the list of high-priority research and extension areas under the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to specifically include research on the agricultural impacts of microplastics and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The research scope covers surveying concentrations, developing filtering techniques for biosolids, analyzing impacts on crops and soil, understanding contaminant fate and transport, and researching remediation methods for contaminated systems.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFarmers and agricultural producersImpactPotential for improved soil health, crop safety, and sustainable practices through better understanding and remediation of contaminants.MechanismFederal research grants leading to new knowledge and technologies.ScaleNational
GroupConsumers of agricultural productsImpactPotential for increased food safety and reduced exposure to contaminants through improved agricultural practices.MechanismResearch-driven improvements in food production.ScaleNational
GroupScientific researchers and universitiesImpactNew funding opportunities and research directives, fostering innovation in environmental agriculture.MechanismFederal research grants.ScaleNational

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for addressing emerging threats to agricultural productivity and food safety. By specifically targeting microplastics and PFAS, the bill ensures dedicated resources are allocated to understanding and mitigating these pervasive contaminants, which are increasingly found in biosolids used on farmland, thereby protecting both the environment and public health.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against expanding research into environmental contaminants, as the issue is generally recognized as important. However, some might express concern about the potential for research findings to lead to new regulations that could burden farmers or wastewater treatment facilities, or about the allocation of finite research funds.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the immediate need for research on emerging contaminants and the allocation of finite research funds. While critical, this new priority might draw resources from other established agricultural research areas, requiring careful balancing by funding agencies.

Section 3, amending 7 U.S.C. 5925

Extension of Research and Extension Initiative Authorization

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision reauthorizes the existing high-priority research and extension initiatives under Section 1672 of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. It extends the authorization for appropriations from fiscal year 2023 to fiscal year 2031, ensuring continued funding availability for these programs, including the newly added research area on microplastics and PFAS.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this