The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 405·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 15, 2025

Keep Every Extra Penny Act of 2025

IntroducedTaxationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Fulcher, Russ [R-ID-1]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 15, 2025

Bottom line

The "Keep Every Extra Penny Act of 2025" proposes to make all federally mandated overtime pay tax-exempt, aiming to increase take-home pay for workers who earn overtime.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude overtime compensation, specifically that required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, from an individual's gross income for federal income tax purposes. This means that any wages earned by an employee for working more than 40 hours in a workweek, at a rate not less than one and one-half times their regular rate, would not be subject to federal income tax.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill directly benefits hardworking Americans by allowing them to keep more of the money they earn through extra effort. They contend that taxing overtime compensation discourages individuals from working additional hours and that exempting it would incentivize productivity, reward diligence, and provide much-needed financial relief to middle and lower-income families who rely on overtime pay.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that while the intent to help workers is laudable, this tax exclusion would disproportionately benefit higher-income earners who often receive higher overtime rates, potentially exacerbating income inequality. They may also raise concerns about the significant loss of federal tax revenue, which could necessitate cuts to other programs or increase the national debt, without clear evidence that it would substantially boost overall economic activity or labor supply.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its core legislative change.

Section 2(a), inserting new Section 139J into Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Exclusion of Overtime Compensation from Gross Income

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes that any compensation received by an individual for working overtime, specifically the overtime pay mandated by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), will no longer be counted as part of their gross income for federal income tax calculations. This means that the additional earnings from working beyond standard hours will be exempt from federal income tax, directly increasing the take-home pay for eligible workers.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEmployees who earn overtime compensation under FLSAImpactIncreased net income from overtime earningsMechanismOvertime pay is excluded from gross income, reducing taxable incomeScaleVaries based on individual income level and amount of overtime worked
GroupFederal government (IRS, Treasury)ImpactReduced tax revenueMechanismBroader tax base exclusionScalePotentially significant, depending on total national overtime earnings

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly rewards workers for their extra hours and effort, putting more money into their pockets. They believe it incentivizes work and provides a tangible benefit to those who often rely on overtime to make ends meet or improve their financial standing.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision creates a new tax loophole that could disproportionately benefit higher-income earners who receive substantial overtime, while providing less relief to those who rarely work overtime or are exempt from FLSA overtime rules. They would also point to the significant revenue loss for the federal government.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the goal of increasing take-home pay for workers against the potential for significant federal revenue loss and questions of equitable benefit distribution across different income brackets and types of workers.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this