The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 416·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 15, 2025

No Welfare for the Wealthy Act of 2025

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 14, 2025

Bottom line

The bill seeks to eliminate a specific pathway for households to receive SNAP benefits if they do not meet standard federal income and asset tests, potentially reducing the number of eligible recipients and increasing administrative burden on states.

What it actually does

This bill amends Section 5(a) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to explicitly state that no household shall be eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits unless it meets the income and resource criteria under subsections (c) and (g) of that Act. This change aims to eliminate the practice of 'broad-based categorical eligibility' (BBCE), which allows states to waive standard federal gross income and asset tests for households receiving a nominal benefit from another federal or state program.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill closes a loophole that allows households with higher incomes or significant assets to receive SNAP benefits, ensuring that food assistance is reserved for those genuinely in need and restoring program integrity. They contend it prevents abuse of taxpayer funds and aligns the program with its original intent to serve the most vulnerable.

Opponents contend

Opponents would likely argue that closing this loophole could remove essential food assistance from working families who may technically exceed gross income limits but still struggle with high living costs, or from those who benefit from the simplified application process under broad-based categorical eligibility. They might contend it adds administrative burden to states and could increase food insecurity among the working poor.

The bill text is exceptionally short and clear, allowing for rapid comprehension of its direct impact on SNAP eligibility rules.

Section 2, amending Section 5(a) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014(a))

Elimination of Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE) Pathway

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision modifies the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to explicitly require all households to meet the income and resource criteria specified in subsections (c) and (g) to be eligible for SNAP benefits. This change aims to prevent states from using 'broad-based categorical eligibility' to extend SNAP benefits to households whose gross income or assets exceed the federal limits, often by providing them with a nominal benefit from another program, thereby bypassing standard eligibility tests.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupHouseholds currently receiving SNAP benefits through broad-based categorical eligibility (BBCE) that exceed federal gross income or asset limitsImpactLoss of SNAP benefitsMechanismDirect amendment to eligibility criteria, removing the flexibility for states to waive standard income/asset tests for certain households.ScalePotentially thousands to millions of households, depending on current state BBCE policies and the specific income/asset thresholds they use.
GroupState SNAP agenciesImpactIncreased administrative burden and potential need to revise eligibility determination processesMechanismRequirement to apply federal income and resource tests to all applicants, necessitating updates to IT systems and staff training.ScaleSignificant operational changes for states currently using BBCE, potentially leading to higher administrative costs and processing delays.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision ensures that SNAP benefits are targeted to the most financially vulnerable, preventing households with higher incomes or significant assets from receiving assistance intended for the poor. They believe it restores fiscal responsibility and program integrity by enforcing consistent eligibility standards nationwide.

Critics contend

Critics would contend that this provision could disproportionately affect working families who, despite having gross incomes slightly above federal limits, still struggle with high living costs and may rely on SNAP to supplement their food budget. They might also argue it removes a valuable tool for states to streamline eligibility, reduce administrative churn, and provide assistance to a broader range of low-income individuals.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for strict eligibility criteria and fiscal integrity against the potential for increased food insecurity among marginally higher-income working families and increased administrative complexity for states that have relied on BBCE for efficiency.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this