The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 4180·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 26, 2025

Canyon’s Law

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 26, 2025

Bottom line

Canyon's Law bans the use of M-44 cyanide devices on federal public lands, aiming to prevent accidental poisonings of humans, pets, and non-target wildlife by requiring their removal.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the use of M-44 devices, commonly known as "cyanide bombs," on all federal public lands. It further mandates that any federal, state, or county agency that has previously deployed such devices on public land must remove them within 30 days of the bill's enactment. The bill defines M-44 devices as those designed to propel sodium cyanide when triggered by an animal, and public land as any federal land under the administrative jurisdiction of specified public land management agencies.

Proponents argue

Supporters emphasize the critical need to protect public safety, pets, and non-target wildlife from the severe dangers posed by M-44 devices. They cite numerous documented incidents of accidental human exposure, pet deaths, and the killing of endangered species, arguing that the indiscriminate and highly toxic nature of these devices makes their continued use on public lands unacceptable and irresponsible.

Opponents contend

Opponents, primarily representing livestock producers and some wildlife management agencies, would argue that M-44 devices are a necessary and effective tool for predator control, essential for protecting livestock and poultry from depredation. They might contend that the economic impact of removing this tool, especially in remote areas where alternative methods are less feasible or more costly, would be significant for ranchers.

The bill is very short and clearly written, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions within minutes.

Section 3(a)

Prohibition of M-44 Devices on Public Land

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly forbids any federal, state, or county agency from preparing, placing, installing, setting, deploying, or otherwise using M-44 devices on any land designated as "public land" under federal administrative jurisdiction. This includes lands managed by the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, and Forest Service.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal, State, and County Agencies (e.g., USDA Wildlife Services)ImpactProhibited from using a specific predator control tool.MechanismDirect legal prohibition.ScaleNationwide on public lands.
GroupLivestock and poultry producersImpactLoss of a predator control tool, potentially leading to increased predation or higher costs for alternative methods.MechanismRemoval of M-44 option.ScaleLocalized impact where M-44s were previously used on adjacent public lands.
GroupGeneral Public, Pet OwnersImpactIncreased safety from accidental cyanide exposure.MechanismRemoval of hazardous devices from public access areas.ScaleNationwide on public lands.
GroupNon-target Wildlife (e.g., bears, eagles, wolves, domestic dogs)ImpactReduced risk of accidental poisoning and death.MechanismElimination of M-44 devices.ScaleNationwide on public lands.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this prohibition is essential to protect public safety, pets, and non-target wildlife from the indiscriminate and highly toxic nature of M-44 devices, citing numerous documented incidents of harm.

Critics contend

Opponents would contend that this prohibition removes a critical and cost-effective tool for managing predator populations, potentially leading to increased livestock losses for ranchers who graze animals on public lands.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the protection of public safety and non-target wildlife with the economic interests of livestock producers who rely on predator control measures.

Section 3(b)

Mandatory Removal of Existing M-44 Devices

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates that any federal, state, or county agency that has previously deployed M-44 devices on public land must remove all such devices within 30 days of the bill's enactment. This ensures a swift cessation of their use and immediate reduction of associated risks.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this