The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 4192·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 26, 2025

the Military PFAS Transparency Act of 2025

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8]
Committees
Armed Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 26, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to increase transparency and accelerate the Department of Defense's efforts to address PFAS contamination at military sites through mandatory reporting, a strategic plan, and a public data dashboard.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of Defense to submit annual reports to Congress detailing the funding and status of interim remedial actions for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at military installations. It also mandates the development of a PFAS remediation acceleration strategy and the creation of a publicly accessible online dashboard to enhance transparency regarding these cleanup efforts.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will enhance accountability, provide critical information to Congress and affected communities, and drive faster cleanup of hazardous PFAS chemicals, thereby protecting public health and the environment from widespread contamination originating from military operations.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that existing reporting mechanisms are sufficient, or that the bill imposes an undue administrative burden on the Department of Defense without providing additional resources, potentially diverting funds and personnel from actual remediation efforts to bureaucratic tasks.

The bill is very short and easy to read, making it highly accessible for anyone wishing to understand its provisions.

Section 2(a), adding new Section 2717 to Chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code

Annual Report on PFAS Funding and Status

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of Defense submit an annual report to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. The report must detail the funding budgeted, obligated, and expensed for interim PFAS remedial actions at each military installation, both for the current and any prior fiscal year. It also requires a phase-specific status update for each action, including its design, contracting, construction, operation, timelines, and explanations for any delays exceeding 12 months beyond original projections.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of Defense (DoD)ImpactIncreased reporting requirements and administrative burden.MechanismStatutory mandate for annual reports to Congress.ScaleAffects all military installations with PFAS interim remedial actions.
GroupCongressional Armed Services CommitteesImpactEnhanced oversight capabilities and access to detailed information.MechanismReceipt of mandated annual reports.ScaleDirect impact on committee functions.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this detailed reporting will provide Congress with the necessary tools to oversee DoD's PFAS cleanup efforts, identify bottlenecks, and ensure efficient use of taxpayer money, ultimately accelerating remediation and improving accountability.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that the level of detail required could be overly burdensome, diverting resources and personnel from actual cleanup work to administrative tasks, potentially slowing down remediation rather than accelerating it.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire for comprehensive oversight and the potential for increased administrative burden on the DoD, which could impact the pace of actual cleanup operations by reallocating resources.

Section 2(b)

Required Remediation Acceleration Strategy

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a comprehensive strategy within 180 days of the Act's enactment. This strategy must include criteria for prioritizing military installations for cleanup based on human health risk, environmental impact, and proximity to affected communities. It also needs to establish timelines for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) cleanup process phases, outline a plan for deploying additional resources and technologies, identify the number of DoD-accredited PFAS testing laboratories (and those in process), and set performance benchmarks for response efforts.

Section 2(c)

Publicly Available Online Dashboard

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Secretary of Defense to create and maintain a publicly accessible online dashboard within one year of the Act's enactment. The dashboard must be updated semi-annually and include summaries of site-by-site funding and expenditures, the status of remediation and investigation efforts, projected and actual completion timelines, and points of contact for community engagement regarding PFAS actions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this