The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 4262·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 30, 2025

To reauthorize programs related to health professions education, and for other purposes.

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 10, 2025

Bottom line

This bill ensures the continuation of key federal programs supporting health professions education and workforce development by reauthorizing their funding for the next five fiscal years.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes appropriations for eleven specific health professions education and workforce development programs under the Public Health Service Act. For each program, it strikes the existing appropriation language and inserts new annual funding levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, ensuring continued federal support for initiatives ranging from scholarships for disadvantaged students to primary care training and geriatrics education.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that these programs are essential for maintaining a robust, diverse, and well-trained healthcare workforce, addressing critical shortages in areas like primary care and geriatrics, and promoting equitable access to health professions education for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Reauthorization provides vital stability and predictability for educational institutions and students relying on this federal support.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the goals of these programs are important, the bill represents a simple reauthorization without a thorough re-evaluation of program effectiveness, efficiency, or alignment with evolving healthcare needs. Some may argue that federal funding in these areas could be more effectively allocated or that states and private entities should bear a greater share of the responsibility for health workforce development.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions and implications within a very short timeframe.

Section 1(a)

Reauthorization of Centers of Excellence

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision reauthorizes appropriations for the Centers of Excellence program, which provides grants to health professions schools that have a significant number of students from underrepresented minority groups. It sets the annual funding at $28,422,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030, ensuring continued support for institutions focused on diversifying the healthcare workforce.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupHealth professions schools serving underrepresented minoritiesImpactContinued funding and operational stability for programs designed to support minority students.MechanismDirect federal appropriations through grants.ScaleMillions of dollars annually for five years, supporting numerous institutions nationwide.
GroupStudents from underrepresented minority groupsImpactIncreased access to quality health professions education and supportive resources.MechanismSupport for programs, faculty, and resources at Centers of Excellence.ScaleBenefits students enrolled in supported institutions, fostering a more diverse healthcare pipeline.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that Centers of Excellence are crucial for diversifying the healthcare workforce and addressing health disparities by supporting institutions that train minority health professionals. Continued funding ensures these vital programs can operate effectively.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the reauthorization of Centers of Excellence programs, as their mission to support diversity in healthcare is widely accepted. Potential concerns might revolve around the efficiency of funding allocation or program effectiveness, but not the underlying goal.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension involves balancing the need for sustained funding for diversity initiatives with overall federal budget constraints and ensuring the programs achieve measurable outcomes in workforce diversity.

Section 1(b)

Reauthorization of Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section reauthorizes the Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students program, which provides financial aid to students from disadvantaged backgrounds pursuing health professions degrees. It allocates $55,014,000 annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, aiming to reduce financial barriers to education and promote diversity in healthcare.

Section 1(e)

Reauthorization of Primary Care Training and Enhancement

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision reauthorizes appropriations for the Primary Care Training and Enhancement program, which supports training for primary care physicians, physician assistants, and other health professionals. It sets the annual funding at $49,924,000 for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, aiming to bolster the primary care workforce.

Section 1(g)

Reauthorization of Area Health Education Centers (AHEC)

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section reauthorizes the Area Health Education Centers (AHEC) program, which works to improve the supply, distribution, diversity, and quality of the primary care workforce, especially in rural and underserved areas. It provides $47,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, sustaining efforts to bring healthcare professionals to high-need regions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this