The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 4482·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 17, 2025

Stop NOAA Closures Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Amo, Gabe [D-RI-1]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 18, 2025

Bottom line

The bill prevents any immediate changes to NOAA facilities and establishes a long-term requirement for transparency and congressional oversight before future facility actions can be taken, effectively safeguarding NOAA's physical infrastructure for several years.

What it actually does

This bill imposes an immediate moratorium on the closure, suspension, lease termination, construction cessation, consolidation, or any new limitation on access to facilities of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This moratorium remains in effect until 180 days after a comprehensive report justifying any such actions is submitted to Congress, which cannot occur earlier than January 21, 2029. After the moratorium, any future changes to NOAA facilities will require a 30-day advance report to Congress detailing the justification and impact.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for ensuring the stability and continuity of vital NOAA services, including weather forecasting, climate research, and fisheries management, which rely on a robust network of facilities. They contend that preventing arbitrary closures or consolidations protects critical scientific infrastructure and ensures public access to essential services, promoting long-term planning and preventing disruptive, politically motivated decisions.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that this bill unduly restricts the executive branch's ability to efficiently manage federal assets and adapt to changing operational needs or budgetary constraints. They may contend that imposing a moratorium and extensive reporting requirements creates unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles, potentially hindering cost-saving measures or preventing the modernization and optimization of NOAA's facility footprint.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)(1)

Immediate Moratorium on NOAA Facility Actions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes an immediate halt on any actions to close, suspend, terminate leases of, cease construction of, consolidate, or otherwise limit access to facilities operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This means that for the duration of the moratorium, NOAA's physical infrastructure cannot be significantly altered or reduced.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)ImpactPrevents any changes to its facility footprint, ensuring operational stability.MechanismDirect prohibition on specific actions.ScaleAgency-wide
GroupCommunities hosting NOAA facilitiesImpactEnsures continued local presence and associated economic activity.MechanismPrevents closures or consolidations that could lead to job losses or reduced local investment.ScaleLocal
GroupUsers of NOAA services (e.g., fishermen, researchers, general public)ImpactGuarantees continued access to services provided by these facilities.MechanismPrevents disruptions that could arise from facility closures or reduced access.ScaleNational

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this moratorium is essential to protect critical scientific and operational infrastructure from potentially arbitrary or politically motivated decisions, ensuring the continuity of vital public services. They contend it provides stability for NOAA's workforce and the communities that rely on these facilities.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that such a broad moratorium removes necessary flexibility for NOAA and the General Services Administration to adapt to evolving needs, optimize resource allocation, or implement efficiency improvements. They may contend it could lock in outdated or underutilized facilities, preventing modernization.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for stability and continuity of services against the need for administrative flexibility and potential efficiency gains through facility optimization. It prioritizes preventing disruption over allowing immediate managerial discretion.

Section 2(a)(3) and (4)

Moratorium Cessation and Required Congressional Report

prominently featuredstraightforward

The moratorium established in the bill is not permanent; it will cease to be effective 180 days after a specific report is submitted to Congress. This report, which cannot be submitted earlier than January 21, 2029, must be jointly prepared by the Secretary of Commerce, the NOAA Administrator, and the Administrator of General Services. It must outline and justify the process for selecting any NOAA facility for closure or other limitation, including detailed criteria and a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis.

Section 2(b)

Future Reporting Requirements for NOAA Facility Actions

mentioned in summarystraightforward

Once the initial moratorium has ended (after the 2029 report and 180-day waiting period), this provision mandates that any subsequent actions to close, suspend, terminate leases of, cease construction of, consolidate, or limit access to NOAA facilities must be preceded by a 30-day advance report to Congress. This report must include the same detailed justification, criteria, and cost-benefit analysis as required for the moratorium's cessation.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this