The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 4603·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 22, 2025

FAIR Act

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. McGuire, John J. [R-VA-5]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 22, 2025

Bottom line

This bill restricts state utility regulators from approving rates for electric utilities that incorporate certain DEI initiatives or non-pecuniary ESG considerations into their operations or rate-setting processes.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to prohibit state regulatory authorities from approving rates for electric utilities that engage in specific Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion (DEI) practices or consider certain Environmental, Social, or Governance (ESG) factors. It defines prohibited DEI practices as those involving discrimination or mandatory ideological training, and restricts ESG considerations unless directly tied to pecuniary impacts or required by law. The aim is to ensure utility rates are based solely on financial and operational efficiency.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue the bill ensures electric utility rates are based solely on pecuniary factors related to cost reduction, reliability, and direct legal compliance, preventing utilities from passing on costs associated with political or ideological agendas like certain DEI or ESG initiatives to ratepayers. They contend this will lead to fairer, more affordable rates and prevent discrimination or compelled speech in the workplace.

Opponents contend

Opponents would likely argue that the bill unduly restricts state regulatory authority and utility autonomy, potentially hindering efforts to promote diversity, address climate change risks, or improve corporate governance. They might contend that certain DEI and ESG factors, when properly managed, can enhance long-term utility resilience, attract talent, and ultimately benefit ratepayers, and that prohibiting their consideration could lead to less sustainable or equitable outcomes.

The bill is very short and can be read quickly, making it accessible for evaluation by an informed reader.

Section 2, amending Section 111(d) of PURPA by adding paragraph (22).

Prohibition on Approving Rates for Utilities Engaging in Certain DEI Practices

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision forbids state regulatory authorities from approving rates for electric utilities if those utilities engage in specific Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion (DEI) practices. These prohibited practices include discriminating based on race, color, ethnicity, religion, biological sex, or national origin, or requiring employees to undergo training or assent to statements asserting inherent superiority/inferiority or oppression based on these characteristics.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState regulatory authoritiesImpactRestricted authorityMechanismCannot approve rates for non-compliant utilities.ScaleBroad impact on regulatory oversight.
GroupElectric utilitiesImpactOperational changes requiredMechanismMust cease certain DEI practices to have rates approved.ScaleSignificant impact on corporate HR and governance.
GroupUtility employeesImpactChanges to workplace training and policies.MechanismElimination of certain DEI training or statements.ScaleDirect impact on employee experience and corporate culture.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision prevents utilities from imposing potentially discriminatory or divisive DEI practices on employees and ratepayers, ensuring that utility operations focus on core services without ideological mandates. They contend it protects individuals from compelled speech and ensures fairness.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this provision stifles legitimate efforts by utilities to foster inclusive workplaces and address historical inequities, potentially harming employee morale and diversity within the sector. They may assert that such DEI practices are vital for attracting and retaining a diverse workforce and promoting equitable service delivery.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire to prevent perceived discrimination or ideological imposition in the workplace against the goals of promoting diversity and inclusion within utility companies.

Section 2, amending Section 111(d) of PURPA by adding paragraph (23).

Prohibition on Approving Rates for Utilities Considering Certain ESG Factors

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision prohibits state regulatory authorities from approving rates for electric utilities if those utilities consider Environmental, Social, or Governance (ESG) factors when setting rates or making operational decisions that affect rates. It includes exceptions for compliance with specific federal or state laws, provided such compliance is limited to direct legal obligations and does not involve discretionary ESG considerations.

Section 2, amending Section 111(d) of PURPA by adding paragraph (23)(C).

Definition of Environmental, Social, or Governance (ESG) Factor

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section defines "environmental, social, or governance factor" (ESG factor). It includes environmental considerations like climate change policies and carbon emissions reductions (unless directly tied to pecuniary impacts or legal compliance), social considerations like corporate board quotas or supplier diversity programs based on protected characteristics (unless legally required), and governance considerations for advancing political/ideological objectives unrelated to pecuniary outcomes.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this