The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 4688·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 23, 2025

COOL OFF Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 23, 2025

Bottom line

This bill mandates a 3-business-day waiting period for handgun purchases and transfers, aiming to reduce impulsive gun violence while exempting specific professional and temporary uses.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a mandatory 3-business-day waiting period before a person can receive a handgun, applying to both transfers between unlicensed individuals and sales by licensed firearms dealers. It includes specific exceptions for law enforcement, military personnel, armed private security professionals, certain temporary family loans, and temporary transfers for immediate self-defense or supervised activities like target shooting and hunting.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that waiting periods provide a crucial "cooling-off" period, preventing impulsive acts of violence, suicide, and crimes of passion. They contend that a short delay can save lives by allowing time for emotions to subside or for individuals in crisis to reconsider, without unduly burdening responsible gun owners. The exceptions included in the bill are designed to ensure that legitimate needs for immediate firearm access are not hindered.

Opponents contend

Opponents argue that waiting periods infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens to self-defense, especially in situations requiring immediate protection. They contend that such delays can leave individuals vulnerable during emergencies and that criminals will not adhere to such laws, making them ineffective against those who intend harm. Critics also argue that the bill creates an unnecessary federal mandate that burdens legal gun ownership.

The bill is very short and easy to read, allowing ample time for evaluation of its provisions.

Section 2(a), amending 18 U.S.C. 922(aa)(1)

3-Day Waiting Period for Private Handgun Transfers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision makes it unlawful for individuals not licensed as firearms dealers to receive a handgun from another unlicensed person unless at least three business days have passed since the recipient first offered to take possession of the handgun. This applies to private sales or transfers between individuals, closing a potential loophole in existing federal law.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals engaging in private handgun transfersImpactImposes a mandatory 3-business-day waiting period before receiving a handgun.MechanismFederal law prohibiting receipt of a handgun without the elapsed waiting period.ScaleApplies nationwide to all private handgun transfers not covered by exceptions.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this closes a loophole by extending waiting periods to private sales, preventing individuals from circumventing dealer-based waiting periods and enhancing public safety by ensuring a cooling-off period for all handgun acquisitions.

Critics contend

Critics contend this further restricts the rights of law-abiding citizens in private transactions, arguing it is an unnecessary burden on personal property transfers and does not deter criminals, who will simply ignore such laws.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire for immediate access to firearms for self-defense against the public safety goal of preventing impulsive acts of violence in private transactions.

Section 2(b)(1), amending 18 U.S.C. 922(t)(1)

3-Day Waiting Period for Licensed Dealer Handgun Sales

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that licensed firearms dealers must wait three business days after contacting the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) before transferring a handgun to a non-licensed individual. This extends the waiting period to all standard retail handgun purchases, ensuring a consistent delay across most commercial transactions.

Section 2(b)(2), adding 18 U.S.C. 922(t)(7)

Exceptions to the 3-Day Waiting Period

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision outlines several specific exceptions to the 3-business-day waiting period. These include transfers to law enforcement agencies or officers, armed private security professionals, or members of the armed forces acting within their official duties. It also exempts certain temporary loans between close family members (spouses, domestic partners, parents/children, siblings, aunts/uncles/nieces/nephews, or grandparents/grandchildren) for lawful purposes. Additionally, temporary transfers necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm, and temporary transfers for activities like target shooting, hunting, trapping, or fishing are exempt, provided the transferor has no reason to believe the transferee will misuse the firearm or is prohibited from possessing one.

FOUND

Defines "3 business days" as "a day on which State offices are open."

Section 2(a) and 2(b)(1)(C)

Why it matters:This is a common legislative drafting practice to define terms in context, but a casual reader might assume "business days" refers to federal business days or simply weekdays, missing the state-specific dependency.

Case for: Proponents would argue this provides clarity and consistency, ensuring the waiting period accounts for state-specific holidays or closures, making it practical for local implementation and avoiding conflicts with state government schedules.

Case against: Critics might argue that tying the definition to state office operations could lead to varying interpretations or inconsistencies across states, or that it could unintentionally extend the waiting period beyond three calendar days if state offices are closed for multiple days, creating an unpredictable delay.

Estimated impact: This definition could slightly extend the waiting period in states with more holidays or closures, impacting the timing of handgun receipts for all affected individuals.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this