EATS Act of 2025
- Sponsor
- Rep. Gomez, Jimmy [D-CA-34]
- Committees
- Agriculture Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Jul 29, 2025
Bottom line
This bill significantly expands eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to a broader category of college students, aiming to alleviate food insecurity among this population.
What it actually does
This bill amends the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to remove specific eligibility disqualifications that currently prevent many students enrolled in institutions of higher education from participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). It explicitly includes bona fide students enrolled at least half-time in the definition of eligible households and repeals the existing restrictive student eligibility requirements.
Proponents argue
Proponents argue that many college students face significant food insecurity, and current SNAP eligibility rules create an unnecessary barrier, preventing them from accessing essential nutrition. They contend that removing these restrictions will improve student well-being, academic performance, and reduce the burden of hunger on a vulnerable demographic.
Opponents contend
Opponents might argue that expanding SNAP eligibility to a broader student population could significantly increase program costs and potentially strain federal resources. They may also suggest that financial aid or campus-based food programs are more appropriate and targeted solutions for student food insecurity, rather than a universal entitlement program.
The bill is very concise and clearly written, making it easy for any reader to quickly understand its core purpose and provisions.
Section 2(1), amending Section 3(m)(5) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008
Inclusion of Half-Time Students in SNAP Household Definition
This provision adds a new category to the definition of 'household' for SNAP purposes, explicitly including individuals who are bona fide students enrolled at least half-time in any recognized school, training program, or institution of higher education. This change is foundational for their eligibility, ensuring they can be considered for benefits if they meet other general SNAP criteria.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue this rectifies an oversight where students, despite facing financial hardship, were often excluded from SNAP, ensuring they have access to basic nutritional support essential for their health and academic success.
Critics contend
Critics might argue that this broadens the scope of SNAP beyond its original intent, potentially diverting resources from other vulnerable populations or increasing the overall cost of the program without sufficient justification.
Tradeoffs
This provision balances the goal of supporting student welfare and addressing food insecurity against concerns about expanding the scope and cost of federal entitlement programs.
Section 2(2), amending Section 6(d)(2)(C) and striking Section 6(e) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008
Repeal of Specific Student SNAP Eligibility Restrictions
This provision explicitly strikes the language in current law that makes students enrolled in higher education ineligible for SNAP unless they meet specific, often restrictive, requirements (such as working 20 hours a week, caring for a dependent, or participating in specific work-study programs). It also repeals the entire subsection detailing these student eligibility requirements, effectively removing all student-specific barriers to SNAP access.