The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Mar 16, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The diff reflects the bill's procedural status change from being passed by the House to being received and referred in the Senate, including an updated attestation. No substantive policy changes were made to the bill's text.

H.R. 528·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 16, 2025

Post-Disaster Reforestation and Restoration Act

Passed HousePublic Lands and Natural ResourcesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Pettersen, Brittany [D-CO-7]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 17, 2026

Bottom line

This bill creates a time-limited, Interior-led program to proactively restore federal and Indian lands damaged by natural disasters, focusing on areas unlikely to recover without intervention.

What it actually does

This bill establishes the Post-Disaster Reforestation and Restoration Program within the Department of the Interior, requiring the Secretary to annually identify federal and Indian lands needing reforestation and restoration after unplanned disturbances that are unlikely to regenerate naturally. The program prioritizes projects and implements them through grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements, including those with Indian Tribes and other stakeholders, with a sunset clause of seven years.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is crucial for ecological resilience, ensuring that lands damaged by increasing natural disasters, such as wildfires and severe weather events, are restored efficiently. They emphasize the importance of proactive intervention to prevent further degradation, protect biodiversity, and support the long-term health of ecosystems, especially given the slow pace of natural regeneration in many affected areas.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that while the goal is laudable, the bill could lead to inefficient spending or duplicate existing efforts by other agencies like the Forest Service. Concerns could also be raised about the potential for federal overreach into land management decisions that could be better handled at local or tribal levels, or about the sunset clause limiting long-term planning.

The bill is very concise and can be read quickly, allowing ample time for detailed consideration of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Program Establishment and Identification of Lands

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates the Secretary of the Interior, in coordination with specific federal agencies (National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, and Bureau of Indian Affairs), to annually identify federal and Indian lands that require reforestation and restoration after unplanned disturbances (like wildfires, insect infestations, or weather events) and are unlikely to regenerate naturally. This ensures a systematic approach to post-disaster recovery efforts.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of the Interior and its covered agencies (NPS, FWS, BLM, BOR, BIA)ImpactMandated to establish and manage a new program, requiring resource allocation and inter-agency coordination.MechanismStatutory requirement to identify lands and coordinate efforts.ScaleBroad, affecting all federal and Indian lands under the covered agencies' jurisdiction.
GroupEcosystems on federal and Indian landsImpactBenefit from targeted restoration efforts, leading to improved health and resilience.MechanismDirect intervention through reforestation and restoration projects.ScalePotentially significant, depending on the scope of identified projects.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is essential for addressing the growing backlog of lands needing restoration after severe natural events. It provides a clear mandate and framework for coordinated federal action, ensuring that critical ecosystems are not left to degrade further.

Critics contend

Critics might express concern about the potential for bureaucratic overlap with existing programs or question the efficiency of a new, Interior-led program versus expanding existing efforts within other agencies.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the urgent need for ecosystem restoration and the potential for creating new administrative structures versus leveraging existing ones.

Section 2(b), (c), (d)

Project Implementation, Outreach, and Reporting

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section outlines how the program will operate, requiring the Secretary to propose annual priority projects and allowing implementation through various mechanisms including competitively awarded grants, contracts (specifically mentioning those under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act), and cooperative agreements. It also mandates outreach to Indian Tribes, States, local governments, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian organizations, institutions of higher education, and other stakeholders, and requires annual reports to Congress on progress, funding, and recommendations.

Section 2(e)

Program Termination

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision stipulates that the authority provided under this section shall terminate seven years after the date of enactment of this Act. This sets a clear expiration date for the program, requiring future legislative action if Congress wishes to continue or modify it.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this