Katie Meyer’s Law
- Sponsor
- Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]
- Committees
- Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Sep 23, 2025
Bottom line
The bill aims to enhance due process for students in disciplinary proceedings and increase transparency regarding mental health incidents on college campuses.
What it actually does
This bill mandates that institutions of higher education (IHEs) receiving federal funds establish a policy to provide students accused of code of conduct violations with the option of an adviser. It also amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require IHEs to include incidents of suicide reported to campus authorities in their annual campus security reports.
Proponents argue
Proponents argue that this legislation provides crucial support for students navigating complex university disciplinary systems, ensuring they have an advocate during a potentially stressful process. They also contend that increased transparency regarding suicide incidents will help inform students and parents, and encourage institutions to prioritize mental health resources.
Opponents contend
Opponents, particularly some university administrators, might argue that the bill imposes additional unfunded mandates and administrative burdens on institutions, potentially interfering with existing disciplinary frameworks and resource allocation. Concerns could also be raised about the practicalities of providing trained advisers and the potential for increased legal complexities in campus proceedings.
The bill is very concise and can be read and understood quickly, making it accessible for immediate evaluation.
Section 2(a)
Student Adviser Requirement for Disciplinary Proceedings
This provision requires institutions of higher education (IHEs) to adopt a policy that offers students accused of code of conduct violations the option to be assisted by an adviser. Students can choose an outside adviser or request an independent adviser from the institution. These advisers must be trained by the institution on its adjudication procedures, receive bi-weekly updates (with student permission), and act as an advocate for the student or as authorized by law.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that providing students with advisers ensures a fairer disciplinary process, especially for those who may not understand complex institutional rules or feel overwhelmed. This support can help prevent miscarriages of justice and ensure students' rights are protected.
Critics contend
Critics may contend that this provision adds an unfunded mandate and significant administrative overhead to IHEs, potentially diverting resources from other student services. Some institutions might also express concern about external advisers interfering with established internal processes.
Tradeoffs
The provision balances the desire to enhance student due process and support with the potential for increased administrative burden and complexity for institutions in managing disciplinary actions.
Section 2(b)
Disclosure of Suicide Incidents in Campus Security Reports
This provision amends the Higher Education Act of 1965, specifically the Clery Act, to require institutions of higher education to include 'incidents of suicide that were reported to campus security authorities or local police agencies' in their annual campus security reports. This adds suicide incidents to the list of crimes and incidents that must be disclosed.