The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Apr 23, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The diff adds the name of the Clerk of the House to the attestation at the end of the bill. No substantive policy changes were made between v3 and v4.

H.R. 5587·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 26, 2025

HEATS Act

Passed HouseEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40]
Committees
Energy and Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 15, 2026

Bottom line

The bill streamlines federal permitting and environmental review for certain geothermal energy projects by shifting regulatory authority to states, aiming to accelerate renewable energy development.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to waive federal drilling permit requirements for geothermal exploration and production activities on non-Federal surface estates, provided the United States holds less than 50% ownership of the subsurface geothermal estate and a State permit is obtained. It also exempts these activities from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and conditionally from the National Historic Preservation Act, while preserving federal royalty collection.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill will significantly reduce bureaucratic hurdles and delays for geothermal energy projects, making it faster and more cost-effective to develop clean, renewable energy. They believe it will boost domestic energy production, create jobs, and contribute to energy independence by leveraging existing state regulatory frameworks and eliminating duplicative federal oversight.

Opponents contend

Opponents contend that by waiving federal environmental reviews under NEPA and the Endangered Species Act, and limiting historic preservation reviews, the bill risks significant environmental damage and harm to sensitive ecosystems and cultural sites. They argue it delegates too much authority to potentially less stringent state regulations, undermining crucial federal protections for public lands and resources.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing for quick comprehension of its core provisions and their implications.

Section 2, adding new Section 30(a) to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970

Waiver of Federal Drilling Permit Requirement

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision states that the Secretary of the Interior cannot require a federal drilling permit for geothermal exploration and production activities if they occur on a non-Federal surface estate, the U.S. owns less than 50% of the subsurface geothermal estate, and the operator has a valid state permit. This effectively transfers the primary permitting authority for these specific projects from federal to state agencies.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeothermal energy developers/operatorsImpactReduced regulatory burden, faster project approval process.MechanismElimination of federal drilling permit requirement under specific conditions.ScalePotentially significant for projects meeting the specified criteria.
GroupState regulatory agenciesImpactIncreased responsibility for permitting and oversight of geothermal activities.MechanismFederal deference to state-issued permits.ScaleVaries by state, depending on the prevalence of geothermal resources and development.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this streamlines the permitting process, removing duplicative federal oversight where states already have robust permitting systems, thereby accelerating geothermal development and reducing project costs.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that even with state permits, federal oversight is crucial to ensure consistent environmental standards across different jurisdictions, especially when federal subsurface interests are involved, and to prevent a 'race to the bottom' in regulatory stringency.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire for expedited renewable energy development against the potential for reduced federal environmental and resource management oversight.

Section 2, adding new Section 30(b)(1) and (4) to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970

Exemption from Major Federal Environmental Review Laws (NEPA and ESA)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

Geothermal activities carried out under the new waiver (i.e., with a state permit on non-Federal surface estate with less than 50% federal subsurface ownership) are explicitly declared not a 'major Federal action' for NEPA purposes and are not subject to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. This significantly reduces the environmental review requirements for these projects, bypassing federal environmental impact assessments and consultations.

Section 2, adding new Section 30(b)(5) to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970

Conditional Exemption from National Historic Preservation Act

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

Geothermal activities under the waiver are only considered an 'undertaking' subject to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) if the state where the activity occurs has no state law addressing historic property preservation. This means that if a state has its own historic preservation laws, federal NHPA review is bypassed, deferring to state-level protections.

Section 2, adding new Section 30(c) to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970

Preservation of Federal Royalties and Oversight

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision clarifies that the waiver of federal permits does not affect the amount of royalties due to the United States from geothermal electricity production or byproducts. It also allows the Secretary to conduct onsite reviews and inspections to ensure proper accountability, measurement, and reporting of production and royalty payments, maintaining federal financial oversight.

Section 2, adding new Section 30(d) and (e) to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970

Exclusion of Indian Lands from Waivers

mentioned in summarystraightforward

The entire section waiving federal permits and environmental reviews does not apply to actions on Indian lands or resources managed in trust for the benefit of Indian Tribes. 'Indian land' is defined to include reservations, pueblos, rancherias, and lands held in trust or restricted against alienation for tribes or individual Indians, or by a dependent Indian community, ensuring these lands retain existing federal protections.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this