The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 5661·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 30, 2025

Water Preservation and Affordability Act of 2025

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Sykes, Emilia Strong [D-OH-13]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 1, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to modernize federal clean water funding by prioritizing water and energy efficiency, stormwater management, and sustainable design in infrastructure projects, while also boosting financial support for related grant programs.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) to define and promote the use of "resource preservation techniques" in water infrastructure projects. It integrates these techniques into state capitalization grant agreements and mandates their use, to the maximum extent practicable, for projects receiving loans from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). Additionally, it significantly increases the authorized appropriations for the Wastewater Efficiency Grant Pilot Program and the Clean Water Infrastructure Resiliency and Sustainability Program for fiscal years 2026 through 2031.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is a crucial step towards modernizing the nation's aging water infrastructure, promoting environmental sustainability, and ensuring that federal investments lead to more resilient, efficient, and climate-adaptive water systems. They contend that integrating resource preservation techniques will result in long-term cost savings, reduced environmental impact, and enhanced water security for communities.

Opponents contend

Potential opponents might argue that the new requirements for resource preservation techniques could add bureaucratic complexity or increase upfront costs for local communities, particularly smaller municipalities with limited technical and financial resources. Concerns could also be raised about the level of authorized spending or whether these specific programs are the most effective use of federal funds.

The bill is concise and clearly written, allowing for a quick and accessible evaluation by any interested reader.

Section 2(a), amending FWPCA Section 502

Establishes 'Resource Preservation Technique' Definition

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision adds a new definition to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for "resource preservation technique." This term encompasses any process, material, technique, or technology that improves water efficiency (including reuse, recapture, and conservation), enhances energy efficiency, mitigates stormwater runoff, encourages sustainable project planning, design, and construction, or is environmentally innovative. This definition provides a clear framework for the types of sustainable practices the bill aims to promote.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupWater utilities and municipalitiesImpactGuidance and eligibilityMechanismProvides a clear definition for practices that will be prioritized in federal funding programs.ScaleBroad
GroupEnvironmental engineers and construction companiesImpactDesign and project focusMechanismInfluences the types of techniques and technologies that will be sought for federally funded water projects.ScaleIndustry-wide

Supporters argue

Supporters contend that a clear, comprehensive definition is essential for consistent application of sustainable practices across federal water programs, ensuring that investments are directed towards the most impactful and innovative solutions.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the definition itself, though some might argue it could be too broad or too narrow depending on their specific interests.

Tradeoffs

The definition balances providing a broad scope for innovation with offering specific examples to guide implementation, aiming to be inclusive without being vague.

Section 2(b), amending FWPCA Section 602(b)(13)(B)

Integrates Resource Preservation into State Revolving Fund Agreements

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends the requirements for state capitalization grant agreements under the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). Previously, these agreements had to consider efficient water use and energy conservation. Now, states must consider the broader "use of resource preservation techniques" when developing their agreements with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This expands the scope of sustainable practices that states are expected to integrate into their CWSRF management.

Section 2(c), amending FWPCA Section 603(d)(1) and (i)(1)

Mandates Use of Resource Preservation in CWSRF Projects

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision directly impacts recipients of Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) loans. For projects involving the repair, replacement, or expansion of treatment works, loan recipients are now required to evaluate and use "resource preservation techniques" to the maximum extent practicable. Furthermore, loan agreements must include assurances that recipients will implement these techniques. This moves beyond mere consideration to a direct mandate for project-level implementation.

Section 2(d), amending FWPCA Section 222(e)

Increases Authorization for Wastewater Efficiency Grant Pilot Program

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section significantly increases the authorized appropriations for the Wastewater Efficiency Grant Pilot Program. The authorization is raised to $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031, with funds remaining available until expended. This represents a substantial boost in potential federal funding for pilot projects focused on improving wastewater efficiency.

Section 2(e), amending FWPCA Section 223(g)(1)

Doubles Authorization for Clean Water Infrastructure Resiliency and Sustainability Program

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision doubles the authorized appropriations for the Clean Water Infrastructure Resiliency and Sustainability Program. The authorization is increased to $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031, with funds remaining available until expended. This significant increase aims to provide more federal support for projects that enhance the resilience and sustainability of clean water infrastructure, helping communities adapt to environmental challenges and climate change.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this