The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 5671·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 30, 2025

Colorectal Cancer Payment Fairness Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 30, 2025

Bottom line

This bill ensures Medicare beneficiaries will not pay any out-of-pocket coinsurance for colorectal cancer screening tests, aiming to improve access and early detection.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Social Security Act to permanently eliminate the coinsurance requirement for certain colorectal cancer screening tests under the Medicare program. It removes a previous sunset date of January 1, 2030, and mandates that for 2027 and all subsequent years, Medicare will cover 100% of the cost of these screening tests, meaning beneficiaries will pay no out-of-pocket coinsurance.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that eliminating coinsurance removes a significant financial barrier that can deter Medicare beneficiaries from undergoing crucial colorectal cancer screenings. They contend that increased screening rates will lead to earlier detection, better treatment outcomes, and ultimately save lives and reduce long-term healthcare costs associated with advanced cancer treatments.

Opponents contend

Potential opponents might argue that while the goal is laudable, eliminating coinsurance for all screening tests could increase Medicare expenditures, potentially contributing to the program's long-term financial challenges. They might also suggest that a small coinsurance helps to ensure judicious use of healthcare services, though this argument is less common for preventive screenings.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for public review.

Section 2

Elimination of Coinsurance for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Social Security Act to permanently remove the coinsurance requirement for certain colorectal cancer screening tests covered by Medicare. Specifically, it strikes the previous expiration date of January 1, 2030, and mandates that for 2027 and all subsequent years, Medicare will cover 100% of the cost of these screening tests, meaning beneficiaries will pay no coinsurance.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMedicare beneficiariesImpactFinancial benefit (no out-of-pocket costs for screenings), improved access to preventive care.MechanismDirect amendment to Medicare payment rules.ScaleAffects all Medicare beneficiaries eligible for colorectal cancer screenings.
GroupHealthcare providers (e.g., gastroenterologists, primary care physicians)ImpactPotential increase in demand for screening services, simplified billing for these specific services.MechanismRemoval of patient cost-sharing reduces barriers to care.ScaleAffects providers who offer colorectal cancer screening services to Medicare patients.
GroupMedicare programImpactIncreased expenditures due to covering 100% of costs previously shared by beneficiaries.MechanismDirect change in federal payment responsibility.ScaleSystemic impact on the Medicare trust fund.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that removing financial barriers is critical for increasing screening rates, especially among vulnerable populations, leading to earlier detection of colorectal cancer when it is most treatable. This aligns with public health goals to reduce cancer mortality.

Critics contend

Critics might express concern that while beneficial for individuals, the increased cost burden on the Medicare program could exacerbate its financial sustainability challenges without a clear offset. They might question the long-term fiscal implications of expanding 100% coverage for all such screenings.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the public health benefit of increased cancer screening and early detection against the potential for increased federal healthcare expenditures. It also addresses the tension between individual out-of-pocket costs and the overall financial health of the Medicare system.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this