The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 583·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 21, 2025

BEACH Act of 2025

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Joyce, David P. [R-OH-14]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 22, 2025

Bottom line

The bill updates and reauthorizes a federal program to monitor and improve water quality at coastal recreation areas, broadening its focus to upstream sources and modernizing testing methods to better protect public health.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to expand the scope of coastal recreation waters eligible for federal monitoring grants to include nearby shallow upstream waters and areas present on beaches. It explicitly allows grant funds to be used for identifying specific sources of contamination and requires reporting on such identified sources. Additionally, it reauthorizes $30 million annually for these grants from fiscal years 2025 through 2029 and directs the EPA to update its guidance to reflect innovations in water contamination testing technologies.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for protecting public health and coastal economies by ensuring cleaner coastal recreation waters. They emphasize that expanding monitoring to upstream sources and explicitly allowing funds for source identification will enable states to pinpoint and address pollution origins more effectively. Furthermore, updating guidance to incorporate modern testing technologies is seen as vital for efficient and accurate water quality assessments.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that expanding the scope of monitoring could increase administrative burdens or costs for state and local governments without a proportional increase in public safety, or that the reauthorization amount is either insufficient for the expanded scope or excessive given other environmental priorities. Some may also question the extent of federal involvement versus state and local responsibility for water quality management.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a quick and informed read by any interested party.

Section 2(a)(1)(A), (a)(2)

Expanding Scope of Coastal Recreation Water Monitoring

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to broaden the definition of "coastal recreation waters" for monitoring purposes. It now explicitly includes "nearby shallow upstream waters" and areas "present on" beaches or similar public access points. This means federal grants can be used to monitor water quality in a wider geographical area that directly impacts the cleanliness and safety of beaches.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCoastal communities and residentsImpactPotential improvement in local water quality and public health information.MechanismBroader monitoring coverage leading to better identification of pollution issues.ScaleLocal to regional
GroupRecreational users (swimmers, beachgoers)ImpactReduced exposure to contaminants and enhanced safety during recreational activities.MechanismMore comprehensive monitoring and notification of water quality issues.ScaleIndividual to widespread
GroupState and local environmental agenciesImpactExpanded authority and scope for utilizing federal grant funds for water quality monitoring.MechanismChanges to federal law governing grant eligibility and use.ScaleState and local

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that pollution affecting beaches often originates upstream or directly on the beach itself, making this expansion critical for a comprehensive and effective approach to water quality management. This allows for earlier detection and prevention of contamination, directly safeguarding public health.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against expanding the scope of monitoring, though some might raise concerns about the practical challenges or increased resource demands associated with monitoring a wider geographical area.

Tradeoffs

Broader monitoring provides more comprehensive data and a better understanding of pollution sources, but it may require more resources for sampling, analysis, and data management from state and local agencies.

Section 2(a)(1)(C), (a)(1)(B)

Grant Use for Source Identification and Data Reporting

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision adds a new capability for States and local governments receiving grants: they may now use these funds to identify specific sources of contamination in coastal recreation waters, including the newly defined upstream areas. Furthermore, if a state uses a grant for this purpose, it must report any data related to these identified sources of contamination.

Section 2(a)(3), Section 2(b)

Reauthorization of BEACH Act Grants

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision reauthorizes the appropriation of $30,000,000 annually for grants under Section 406 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. This funding is specifically for fiscal years 2025 through 2029, ensuring the continuation of federal financial support for state and local beach water quality monitoring and notification programs.

Section 3

EPA Guidance on Innovative Testing Technologies

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section directs the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ensure that the guidance provided to States and local governments, concerning the grants under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, reflects innovations in testing technologies for water contamination. This aims to encourage the adoption of more modern and potentially more efficient or accurate methods for assessing water quality.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this