The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6053·119th Congress·Introduced Nov 17, 2025

SGLF Act of 2025

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Nov 17, 2025

Bottom line

The bill provides a dedicated mandate and significant funding authorization to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and partner federal agencies to combat the ecological and economic damage caused by invasive mussel species in the Great Lakes.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956 to specifically authorize the United States Section of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission to develop and coordinate efforts to combat invasive mussel species. It mandates assistance from key federal agencies like the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Crucially, it authorizes the appropriation of $500,000,000 for these efforts over the fiscal years 2026 through 2035.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that invasive mussels, such as zebra and quagga mussels, pose an existential threat to the Great Lakes ecosystem, devastating native fish populations, clogging critical infrastructure, and harming the region's economy. This bill provides essential statutory authority and a substantial, dedicated funding stream to enable a coordinated, long-term strategy to mitigate these destructive impacts, protecting a vital natural resource for future generations.

Opponents contend

While direct opposition to combating invasive species is uncommon, potential critics might raise concerns about the scale of the authorized appropriation, questioning whether $500 million over ten years is the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars or if existing programs could be better leveraged. Some might also argue that the bill could lead to bureaucratic redundancies or that the specified funding might not be fully appropriated in future budget cycles, making the authorization less impactful.

The bill text is exceptionally concise and clear, making it very accessible for a quick read and allowing ample time for a comprehensive evaluation of its policy and fiscal implications.

Section 2, inserting new Section 6A(a) and (b) into the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956

Authorization for Great Lakes Fishery Commission to Combat Invasive Mussels

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision expands the mandate of the United States Section of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, authorizing it to develop and lead efforts to combat invasive species of mussels. It explicitly requires coordination with federal agencies, interstate compacts, and Tribal, State, and local governments. Furthermore, it directs the Secretary of the Interior (through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Geological Survey) and the Secretary of Commerce (through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) to provide assistance to the Commission in these efforts.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGreat Lakes Fishery Commission (U.S. Section)ImpactExpanded mandate and authority to address a specific ecological threat.MechanismNew statutory authorization under the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956.ScaleSignificant expansion of focus to a critical environmental issue.
GroupFederal agencies (DOI, DOC, FWS, USGS, NOAA)ImpactMandated assistance and coordination with the Commission on invasive mussel efforts.MechanismStatutory directive to provide support and expertise.ScaleRequires inter-agency cooperation on a specific environmental management challenge.
GroupGreat Lakes Ecosystem and Native Fish PopulationsImpactPotential for ecological recovery and protection from the destructive impacts of invasive mussels.MechanismDirect efforts to combat mussels, aiming to reduce their population and spread.ScaleBroad ecological benefit across the entire Great Lakes basin.
GroupGreat Lakes States, Tribes, and Local GovernmentsImpactIncreased opportunities for coordination and collaborative projects with federal entities on invasive species management.MechanismExplicit requirement for coordination in developing combat efforts.ScaleFosters regional cooperation on environmental protection and resource management.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is crucial because it provides a clear, dedicated legal framework and ensures inter-agency collaboration, which are vital for mounting an effective, comprehensive response to the pervasive and destructive problem of invasive mussels in the Great Lakes.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the concept of combating invasive species. However, some might contend that existing authorities are sufficient and that creating a new, specific mandate could lead to bureaucratic overlap or inefficient resource allocation if not carefully managed.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension involves balancing the need for focused, dedicated efforts against the risk of duplicating existing programs or potentially diverting resources from other critical Great Lakes conservation initiatives if coordination is not robust.

Section 2, new Section 6A(c) into the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956

Authorization of Appropriations for Invasive Mussel Combat Efforts

prominently featuredstraightforward

This subsection authorizes the appropriation of $500,000,000 for the period covering fiscal years 2026 through 2035. These funds are specifically designated to carry out the efforts to combat invasive species of mussels as outlined in the bill. The bill clarifies that these authorized amounts can be made available to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and are intended to be in addition to any other funds appropriated under the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
Ask Ledger AI about this