The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6061·119th Congress·Introduced Nov 17, 2025

American Farmers First Act

IntroducedForeign Trade and International FinanceMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. McClain Delaney, April [D-MD-6]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 13, 2026

Bottom line

This bill redirects potential U.S. financial support from Argentina to American farmers facing economic hardship due to lost export markets, prioritizing domestic agricultural relief.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the Department of the Treasury's Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) from providing any direct or indirect financial support to Argentina, including currency swaps or sovereign debt purchases. It mandates that any existing financial contracts violating this prohibition be sold or terminated within seven days, with the prohibition itself expiring on December 10, 2027. The proceeds from these sales are then allocated to the Department of Agriculture to provide one-time economic assistance payments to U.S. crop producers adversely impacted by export market losses during the 2025 marketing year.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill prioritizes American farmers over foreign financial stability, especially when U.S. agricultural sectors are facing economic hardship due to lost export markets. They contend that the Exchange Stabilization Fund should be used to support domestic interests rather than bailing out foreign economies, and that farmers deserve direct relief from trade-related impacts.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that restricting the Exchange Stabilization Fund's flexibility could undermine the Treasury's ability to manage international financial crises and protect broader U.S. economic interests. They may contend that such a prohibition could destabilize global markets, potentially leading to negative repercussions for the U.S. economy, and that using the fund for domestic relief is outside its intended purpose.

The bill is very short and can be read and understood quickly, allowing ample time for evaluation.

Section 2

Prohibits Exchange Stabilization Fund Use for Argentina

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends existing law to explicitly forbid the Department of the Treasury's Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) from providing any direct or indirect financial support to Argentina. This includes actions like establishing currency swap lines, purchasing Argentine pesos or sovereign debt, or extending credit instruments. Any existing financial contracts that violate this prohibition must be sold or terminated within seven days of the bill's enactment. This prohibition is temporary, expiring on December 10, 2027.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of the Treasury (Exchange Stabilization Fund)ImpactRestricted operational flexibility and mandates divestment of certain assets.MechanismStatutory amendment to 31 U.S.C. 5302(b).ScaleSignificant restriction on international financial operations related to one country.
GroupArgentina's financial marketsImpactLoss of potential U.S. financial support during periods of instability.MechanismDirect prohibition on U.S. Treasury intervention.ScalePotentially significant for Argentina's ability to manage financial crises.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision ensures U.S. taxpayer funds are not used to bail out foreign governments, especially when domestic needs are pressing. They believe it reasserts congressional control over the ESF's deployment.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision unduly ties the hands of the Treasury Department, limiting its ability to respond to international financial crises that could have ripple effects on the U.S. economy. They may argue that such restrictions could harm diplomatic relations and global financial stability.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire to protect U.S. taxpayer funds and prioritize domestic needs against the potential need for the Treasury to maintain flexibility in managing international financial stability and foreign relations.

Section 3

Establishes Farmer Economic Relief Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section directs the Secretary of the Treasury to transfer all proceeds generated from the sale or termination of financial contracts related to Argentina (as mandated by Section 2) to the Secretary of Agriculture. The Secretary of Agriculture is then required to use these funds to provide one-time economic assistance payments. These payments are specifically for producers of crops that experienced adverse impacts from a loss of export markets during the 2025 marketing year, as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this