The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6066·119th Congress·Introduced Nov 17, 2025

CARE Act of 2025

IntroducedLabor and EmploymentMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-25]
Committees
Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
Last action
Nov 17, 2025

Bottom line

The CARE Act of 2025 aims to align child labor standards in agriculture more closely with those in other industries, enhancing protections for young farmworkers through stricter age requirements, increased penalties, and improved incident reporting.

What it actually does

This bill, the "CARE Act of 2025," significantly strengthens child labor protections in the agricultural industry by amending the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA). It raises the minimum age for most agricultural work to 14, removes specific exemptions for younger children in hand harvesting, prohibits individuals under 18 from working as pesticide handlers, and substantially increases civil and criminal penalties for child labor violations, especially those resulting in serious injury, illness, or death. Additionally, it mandates new data collection and employer reporting requirements for work-related incidents involving child farmworkers.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the bill addresses a long-standing disparity in child labor laws that has historically exposed agricultural children to greater dangers, longer hours, and lower pay than their peers in other sectors. They emphasize the high rates of work-related injuries, fatalities, and sexual abuse among child farmworkers, asserting that the current exceptions are outdated and harmful. Strengthening these protections is presented as a moral imperative to safeguard children's health, safety, education, and overall well-being.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that the bill could severely impact family farms and agricultural businesses that rely on seasonal labor, including the traditional involvement of children in farm work. They may contend that the increased age restrictions and penalties could lead to labor shortages, higher operational costs, and reduced competitiveness for U.S. agriculture. Concerns could also be raised about federal overreach into traditional family farming practices and the potential economic hardship for families who depend on their children's contributions to farm income.

The bill is relatively short and clearly structured, making it accessible for an informed reader to understand its core provisions within a reasonable timeframe.

Section 3, amending FLSA Section 3(l)

Redefinition of "Oppressive Child Labor"

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision redefines "oppressive child labor" under the Fair Labor Standards Act. It now explicitly prohibits any employment for children under 14 years of age by an employer, effectively setting a minimum age of 14 for most non-family farm work. For 14-15 year olds, employment is restricted to periods not interfering with schooling, health, or well-being, and for 16-17 year olds, it prohibits employment in occupations deemed hazardous or detrimental to their health.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupChildren under 14 years oldImpactProhibited from employment by an employer (outside of specific family farm exceptions).MechanismDirect amendment to FLSA definition.ScaleAffects all children under 14 seeking employment in any industry, including agriculture.
GroupAgricultural employersImpactRestricted from employing children under 14.MechanismLegal prohibition.ScaleSignificant impact on agricultural operations that previously employed younger children.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this change aligns child labor standards in agriculture with those in most other industries, protecting very young children from the inherent dangers and demands of work that can interfere with their development, education, and health.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this provision removes flexibility for families and small farms, potentially impacting traditional agricultural practices where children might assist with lighter tasks, and could reduce income opportunities for low-income families.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the protection of young children from potentially harmful labor conditions against the traditional practices and economic needs of agricultural families and businesses.

Section 4, amending FLSA Section 13(c)

Elimination of Agricultural Child Labor Exemptions

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section eliminates most existing exemptions that allowed children younger than 14 to work in agriculture. It specifically repeals the provision that permitted 10- and 11-year-olds to hand-harvest short-season crops. The only remaining general exemption for agricultural child labor is for children under 18 working on a parent's farm outside of school hours, or children under 16 working for a parent in non-hazardous non-manufacturing/mining jobs. This effectively raises the minimum age for most non-family farm agricultural work to 14, consistent with other industries.

Section 5, amending FLSA Section 16(e)(1)

Enhanced Civil Penalties for Child Labor Violations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section substantially increases the civil monetary penalties for employers who violate child labor laws. General violations now carry a penalty of $500 to $15,000 per employee. For violations that result in the serious injury, serious illness, or death of an employee under 18, the penalty is increased to $15,000 to $60,115, with the possibility of doubling this amount for repeated or willful violations. It also defines "serious illness" for these purposes.

Section 6, amending FLSA Section 16

New Criminal Penalties for Severe Child Labor Violations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision introduces new, more severe criminal penalties for individuals who repeatedly or willfully violate child labor provisions, specifically when these violations lead to the death, serious injury, or serious illness of an employee under 18. Such individuals could face imprisonment for up to 5 years, a fine under Title 18 of the U.S. Code, or both.

Section 7, inserting new FLSA Section 12A

Mandated Data Analysis and Reporting on Child Worker Injuries

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Labor to analyze data from various federal and state sources concerning work-related injuries, illnesses, or deaths of children under 18 employed in agriculture. The Secretary must then submit an annual report to Congress summarizing this data, evaluating child labor status and hazards, and identifying potential violations. These reports must also be published in the Federal Register and on the Department of Labor website.

Section 8, inserting new FLSA Section 12B

Mandatory Employer Reporting of Child Farmworker Incidents

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates that agricultural employers must report to the Secretary of Labor within 5 days any work-related serious injury, serious illness, or death of an employee under 18 employed in agriculture. The report must include details such as the employer's and employee's information, incident specifics (e.g., environmental hazards, machinery use, tasks performed), and other information as required by regulation. Failure to report carries a civil penalty of $500 to $7,000 per violation.

Section 9

Ban on Child Pesticide Handlers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section includes a Congressional finding that employing children under 18 as pesticide handlers is "particularly hazardous" and "detrimental to health." It then mandates that, within 30 days of enactment, the Secretary of Labor must revise federal regulations (29 CFR part 570) to explicitly prohibit the employment of any child under 18 from performing tasks or duties defined as those of a "handler" in federal pesticide worker protection standards (40 CFR 170.3).

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this