The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6093·119th Congress·Introduced Nov 18, 2025

Agricultural Cooperative Energy Savings Act of 2025

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 2, 2025

Bottom line

This bill broadens access to USDA energy-related programs for mid-sized agricultural cooperatives, potentially increasing their ability to invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy projects.

What it actually does

The bill expands eligibility for certain United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs, specifically those under Section 9007(c)(1)(A)(i) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, to include agricultural cooperatives that have fewer than 2,500 employees. This change allows a new category of entities to access programs previously limited to other types of rural businesses or individuals, primarily those focused on energy efficiency and renewable energy.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that agricultural cooperatives are vital to rural economies and play a crucial role in the food supply chain, yet many have been excluded from federal energy assistance programs due to existing eligibility criteria. Expanding eligibility to cooperatives with fewer than 2,500 employees will enable these entities to adopt more sustainable energy practices, reduce operational costs, and enhance their competitiveness, ultimately benefiting rural communities and the agricultural sector.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that expanding eligibility without corresponding increases in program funding could dilute the impact of existing programs for current beneficiaries, potentially leading to smaller awards or increased competition for limited resources. Some may also argue that the 2,500-employee threshold is arbitrary and could still exclude many smaller, truly family-run operations, or conversely, include cooperatives that are already well-resourced.

The bill text is exceptionally short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for public review.

Section 2

Expansion of Eligibility for USDA Energy Programs

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends existing law (7 U.S.C. 8107(c)(1)(A)(i)) to allow agricultural cooperatives with fewer than 2,500 employees to be eligible for certain United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs. Previously, these programs were generally available to rural small businesses, agricultural producers, and other rural entities. The amendment specifically targets cooperatives that might have been too large to qualify as small businesses but are not large corporations, enabling them to apply for assistance related to energy savings and renewable energy.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupAgricultural cooperatives with fewer than 2,500 employeesImpactGained eligibility for USDA energy programs (e.g., grants, loans for energy efficiency, renewable energy systems).MechanismDirect amendment to 7 U.S.C. 8107(c)(1)(A)(i).ScalePotentially hundreds or thousands of cooperatives nationwide, depending on the specific programs under 7 U.S.C. 8107.
GroupExisting beneficiaries of USDA energy programsImpactIncreased competition for program funds.MechanismMore eligible applicants without necessarily increased funding.ScaleModerate, depending on the number of new applicants and program appropriations.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that agricultural cooperatives are often significant employers and economic drivers in rural areas, but their unique structure (often larger than a typical small business but not a publicly traded corporation) has historically limited their access to federal support designed for rural development or small businesses. This expansion addresses that gap, allowing these cooperatives to invest in modern energy solutions, which benefits their members, employees, and the broader rural economy.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that the expansion could strain existing program budgets, potentially reducing the average award size or success rate for entities that were already eligible, such as individual farmers or very small rural businesses. They might also question whether cooperatives of this size truly need federal assistance, suggesting they may have sufficient private financing options.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire to support a key segment of the agricultural economy (mid-sized cooperatives) with the potential for increased competition for finite federal resources. It aims to fill an eligibility gap but might inadvertently dilute the impact for other deserving applicants if funding levels remain static.

FOUND

The bill amends Section 9007(c)(1)(A)(i) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8107(c)(1)(A)(i)). This section of the U.S. Code refers to the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP), which provides grants and loan guarantees for renewable energy systems and energy efficiency improvements for agricultural producers and rural small businesses.

Section 2

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for amending existing law, not an attempt to obscure.

Case for: Using statutory citations ensures precision in amending the law and avoids redundancy by not reprinting existing legal text.

Case against: It requires external research for a layperson to fully understand the implications of the amendment.

Estimated impact: The impact is on the eligibility criteria for the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP), a significant USDA program.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this