The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Mar 24, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The changes between v3 and v4 are limited to updates in the legislative process metadata, specifically the attestation of the Clerk and the Senate referral information. There are no substantive policy changes to the bill's text.

H.R. 6267·119th Congress·Introduced Nov 21, 2025

Aviation Supply Chain Safety and Security Digitization Act of 2025

Passed HouseTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Knott, Brad [R-NC-13]
Committees
Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 25, 2026

Bottom line

This bill mandates a GAO study to identify and propose solutions for digitizing aviation supply chain documentation to enhance safety and security against counterfeit parts and falsified records.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) to conduct a comprehensive study on the barriers to adopting digital documentation and verification in the aviation supply chain. The study aims to identify challenges faced by various industry participants and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in transitioning from paper-based to digital systems, with the ultimate goal of combating falsified documentation and counterfeit parts. Following the study, the GAO must submit a report to Congress with recommendations, and the Secretary of Transportation is required to respond to these recommendations.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is a crucial, proactive step to modernize the aviation supply chain, which is currently vulnerable to counterfeit parts and falsified documentation due to reliance on outdated paper-based systems. A comprehensive GAO study will provide an objective, data-driven assessment of the impediments, leading to actionable recommendations that can improve aviation safety and security for all stakeholders, from manufacturers to passengers.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the goal is laudable, commissioning a study delays concrete action on an urgent safety issue. They may contend that the challenges of digitization are already well-understood within the industry, and resources could be more effectively allocated to direct implementation initiatives or pilot programs rather than another report, potentially prolonging the exposure to risks from counterfeit parts.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, allowing for a quick and thorough understanding of its provisions by any interested reader.

Section 2(a)

Mandate for a GAO Study on Digital Documentation Impediments

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) to conduct a study. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze all the obstacles that prevent the widespread use of digital documentation and verification methods within the aviation supply chain. The ultimate goal is to help in detecting falsified documents and counterfeit parts, thereby enhancing the overall safety and security of aviation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupAviation Industry (manufacturers, repair stations, air carriers, lessors, brokers)ImpactIncreased scrutiny and potential for future mandates or incentives for digital adoption based on study findings.MechanismGAO study findings and recommendations.ScaleIndustry-wide.
GroupFederal Aviation Administration (FAA)ImpactDirect assessment of its current practices and potential for accelerated digitization.MechanismGAO study findings and recommendations.ScaleAgency-wide.
GroupPassengers and the PublicImpactIndirectly benefit from enhanced aviation safety and security due to reduced risk of counterfeit parts.MechanismReduced risk of faulty parts in aircraft.ScaleBroad public benefit.

Supporters argue

A comprehensive study by an independent body like the GAO is crucial to understand the systemic challenges hindering digitization and to develop effective, industry-wide solutions. This foundational step is necessary before implementing broad policy changes to ensure they are well-informed and impactful.

Critics contend

Some might argue that the problem is already well-understood, and a study merely delays action. Resources could be better spent on pilot programs or direct incentives for digital adoption rather than another report, especially given the urgency of addressing counterfeit parts.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the need for thorough understanding and data-driven policy development with the desire for immediate action on a critical aviation safety issue. It prioritizes analysis over rapid, potentially less informed, implementation.

Section 2(b)

Scope and Content of the Study

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section precisely defines what the Comptroller General must evaluate during the study. It includes challenges faced by various aviation supply chain participants (like manufacturers, repair stations, and brokers) in adopting digital authorized release certificates (such as FAA Form 8130-3). It also requires an assessment of difficulties in using digital verification tools, establishing standardized documentation across the industry, and the Federal Aviation Administration's transition from paper records and physical signatures to digital alternatives.

Section 2(c) and 2(d)

Report to Congress and Department of Transportation Response

prominently featuredstraightforward

This part of the bill requires the Comptroller General to submit a report containing the study's results to key Congressional committees within one year of the Act's enactment. The report must include recommendations on how to encourage digital form adoption and authentication tools across the entire aviation industry, regardless of company size, and how to accelerate the FAA's own digital transition. Furthermore, the Secretary of Transportation is mandated to respond to any recommendations directed at the Department of Transportation or its offices within 120 days of receiving the report.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this