3 versions

CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Jun 8, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The diff reflects the bill's procedural status, noting its passage in the House and referral to the Senate, and includes the name of the House Clerk. No substantive policy changes were made between v2 and v3.

H.R. 6297119th CongressIntroduced Nov 25, 2025

PEACE Act

Passed HouseInternational AffairsSubstantive

View bill text

Sponsor: Rep. Fine, Randy [R-FL-6]
Committees: Foreign Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action: Jun 9, 2026

Bottom line

This bill requires the State Department to regularly consult with Congress on efforts to combat antisemitism and terrorism in Europe, aiming to enhance oversight and transatlantic cooperation.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs conduct annual consultations with the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for two years. These consultations will focus on assessing the threat of antisemitism and international terrorism in Europe, as well as diplomatic efforts to foster transatlantic cooperation to counter these issues. The bill also includes a Sense of Congress emphasizing the importance of these assessments and diplomatic engagements.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill strengthens congressional oversight of U.S. foreign policy regarding antisemitism and terrorism in Europe, ensuring the State Department prioritizes these critical issues and regularly updates lawmakers on diplomatic efforts and threat assessments. It promotes transatlantic stability and the safety of U.S. citizens abroad by fostering cooperation and accountability.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that this bill imposes an additional, potentially redundant, reporting burden on the State Department, which already engages with Congress on foreign policy matters. They might argue that existing mechanisms are sufficient and that mandating specific consultations could divert resources from direct diplomatic efforts or create unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles without adding significant value.

The bill is exceptionally short and clearly written, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions by any informed reader.

Section 2(b)

Mandated Consultations on Antisemitism and Terrorism in Europe

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs to consult with the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. These consultations must occur within 180 days of the bill's enactment and annually thereafter for two years. The discussions will cover the persistent and growing threat of antisemitism and international terrorism in Europe, as well as diplomatic engagement with European governments on transatlantic cooperation to counter these threats.

GroupImpactMechanismScale

GroupDepartment of State (Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs)ImpactIncreased reporting and consultation requirements.MechanismStatutory mandate for specific, recurring consultations with congressional committees.ScaleLimited to specific officials and committees for a defined period.

GroupU.S. Congress (House Foreign Affairs, Senate Foreign Relations Committees)ImpactEnhanced oversight and information access on European antisemitism and terrorism.MechanismReceipt of mandated consultations and assessments from the State Department.ScaleDirect impact on committee activities and foreign policy oversight.

GroupJewish communities in EuropeImpactPotential indirect benefit from increased U.S. diplomatic focus on combating antisemitism.MechanismU.S. diplomatic engagement with European governments as a result of the consultations.ScaleBroad, indirect, and difficult to quantify.

Supporters argue

Supporters contend that these mandated consultations ensure sustained attention from the State Department on critical issues of antisemitism and terrorism in Europe, providing Congress with vital updates and fostering a more coordinated U.S. foreign policy response. This regular dialogue strengthens the U.S. commitment to protecting vulnerable communities and transatlantic stability.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is laudable, mandating specific consultations could be seen as micromanaging diplomatic efforts or creating unnecessary bureaucratic overhead. They might suggest that the State Department already has mechanisms for such engagement and that this bill adds little substantive value beyond existing practices.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire for increased congressional oversight and focus on critical issues with the potential for adding administrative burden to diplomatic operations. It also highlights the tension between legislative mandates and executive branch flexibility in foreign policy execution.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.