Technical and procedural updates only. The changes between v2 and v3 reflect the bill's legislative progression, noting its passage in the House of Representatives and subsequent referral to the Senate. No substantive policy changes were made to the text of the bill.
Federal Relocation Payment Improvement Act
- Sponsor
- Rep. Jack, Brian [R-GA-3]
- Committees
- Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Jul 21, 2026
Bottom line
The bill aims to streamline federal employee relocations by allowing lump-sum payments, potentially reducing administrative costs and providing flexibility, while requiring oversight on its implementation and financial impact.
What it actually does
This bill amends title 5, United States Code, to allow federal agencies to offer a one-time lump sum payment to employees who relocate in the interest of the Government, instead of reimbursing individual relocation expenses. It mandates the Administrator of General Services (GSA) to establish regulations for calculating these payments and a process for employees to dispute claims. The bill also requires agencies to report data on lump sum payments, employee challenges, and cost savings to GSA, which will then submit an analysis to Congress.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that this bill will modernize the federal government's relocation process, making it more efficient and cost-effective by reducing the administrative burden associated with processing numerous individual expense claims. They contend that offering a lump sum provides employees with greater flexibility in managing their relocation expenses, potentially leading to faster and smoother transitions for federal workers moving for government service. The reporting requirements are seen as a crucial mechanism to ensure accountability and demonstrate actual cost savings.
Opponents contend
Critics might express concern that a lump sum payment, if not calculated appropriately, could disadvantage employees by not fully covering their actual relocation costs, especially for those with complex moves or unforeseen expenses. There could be apprehension that agencies might use lump sums to reduce costs at the expense of employee welfare, potentially impacting recruitment and retention for positions requiring relocation. The discretion given to agencies could lead to inconsistencies across the federal government.
The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a quick read and understanding of its core provisions.
Section 2(a), adding 5 U.S.C. § 5739a(a)
Authority for Lump Sum Relocation Payments
This provision grants federal agencies the authority to provide a one-time lump sum payment to employees who are required to relocate for government service. This payment would be made in lieu of the traditional method of reimbursing individual relocation expenses. The decision to offer a lump sum rests with the head of the agency or their designee, allowing for agency-specific discretion in its application.
Supporters argue
Proponents argue that offering a lump sum payment simplifies the relocation process for both employees and agencies, reducing paperwork and administrative costs. They believe it empowers employees to manage their relocation budget more effectively and efficiently, potentially leading to quicker and less stressful moves.
Critics contend
Opponents might contend that a lump sum payment could be insufficient for some employees, particularly those with unexpected costs or complex family situations, leading to out-of-pocket expenses. They may argue that it could create inequities if the lump sum calculation does not accurately reflect varying relocation costs across different regions or circumstances.
Tradeoffs
The provision balances the desire for administrative efficiency and employee flexibility against the risk of under-reimbursing employees or creating inconsistencies in relocation support across the federal workforce.
Section 2(a), adding 5 U.S.C. § 5739a(b)
GSA Regulations and Employee Dispute Process
This section mandates the Administrator of General Services (GSA) to develop and implement regulations for the new lump sum relocation payment system. These regulations must specify when agencies can use lump sums, how the lump sum amount will be calculated, and establish a clear process for employees to dispute relocation expense claims with their agency. Crucially, it also requires notice of an employee's right to appeal agency decisions to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, ensuring an avenue for recourse.
Section 2(a), adding 5 U.S.C. § 5739a(c)
Reporting Requirements and Congressional Oversight
This section establishes a reporting framework to monitor the effectiveness and impact of the new lump sum relocation payment system. Within three years of the bill's enactment, each federal agency must submit data to GSA, including the number of lump sum payments authorized, the number of employee challenges to claims, and an assessment of cost savings achieved. Agencies must also provide recommendations for improving the Act. GSA is then required to compile and analyze this data and submit a comprehensive report to the House and Senate committees responsible for oversight of government operations.