The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6389·119th Congress·Introduced Dec 3, 2025

Upholding Protections for Unaccompanied Children Act of 2025

IntroducedImmigrationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]
Committees
Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 4, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to restore and strengthen protections for unaccompanied alien children by removing financial barriers to legal relief, ensuring due process, and safeguarding against potentially harmful practices introduced by a previous law.

What it actually does

This bill amends Public Law 119-21, commonly known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," to repeal or create exceptions for various fees and provisions that apply to unaccompanied alien children. It exempts unaccompanied children from fees for asylum, employment authorization, special immigrant juvenile status, immigration court proceedings, and border apprehension. Additionally, it repeals authority for summary removal of unaccompanied children, eliminates provisions for unsafeguarded physical examinations, and restricts the sharing of sponsor information for immigration enforcement purposes.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" undermined long-standing bipartisan protections for vulnerable unaccompanied children, increasing their risk of trafficking, exploitation, and abuse. They contend that this bill is necessary to uphold the intent of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA) by ensuring child-sensitive procedures, access to legal processes, and protection from retraumatization and family separation.

Opponents contend

Opponents of this bill, and proponents of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," would likely argue that the fees and provisions being repealed or amended were intended to deter illegal immigration, manage border flows, and ensure accountability within the immigration system. They might contend that exempting unaccompanied children from these measures creates loopholes, encourages more children to make dangerous journeys, and places an undue burden on taxpayers by increasing the cost of processing and caring for these individuals without sufficient revenue generation.

The bill is concise and clearly states its purpose and provisions, making it accessible for a reader to understand its core changes within a reasonable timeframe.

Section 3(a) through 3(h)

Exemption of Unaccompanied Children from Various Immigration Fees

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section amends the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" to ensure that unaccompanied alien children are not required to pay a range of immigration-related fees. These include fees for asylum applications, employment authorization documents (initial and renewal), special immigrant juvenile status, annual asylum fees, immigration court proceedings, in absentia removal, and border apprehension. The bill specifically repeals the Special Immigrant Juvenile Fee entirely and adds exceptions for unaccompanied children to other fee requirements.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupUnaccompanied alien childrenImpactFinancial relief, increased access to legal protections and work authorization.MechanismDirect repeal or exception from fee requirements.ScaleAffects all unaccompanied children seeking these forms of relief.
GroupDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ)ImpactReduction in fee revenue.MechanismLoss of collected fees.ScalePotentially significant, depending on the number of applicants.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that imposing fees on highly vulnerable unaccompanied children creates insurmountable barriers to seeking humanitarian protection, contrary to U.S. and international law. They contend that these fees force children into debt, making them more susceptible to exploitation and trafficking, and that removing them aligns with the TVPRA's mandate for child-sensitive procedures.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that these fees are a necessary mechanism to manage the costs of processing immigration applications and to deter frivolous claims. They may contend that waiving fees for unaccompanied children could incentivize more individuals to claim this status, straining resources and potentially encouraging illegal border crossings.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the humanitarian concern for vulnerable children against the administrative costs of processing their claims and the desire to manage immigration flows through financial disincentives.

Section 4

Repeal of Summary Removal Authority for Unaccompanied Children

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision repeals Section 100051(8) of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which had provided funding and authority for the summary removal of unaccompanied children, particularly those from countries other than Mexico and Canada, without affording them due process or proper screenings for trafficking and protection concerns. The repeal aims to ensure that all unaccompanied children receive the protections outlined in the TVPRA, including placement in Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) custody and access to legal processes before an immigration judge.

Section 5(a) and 5(b)

Prohibition of Unsafeguarded Body Examinations of Unaccompanied Children

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section repeals provisions in the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" that allowed for potentially physically intrusive examinations of unaccompanied children by both the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). The bill's findings state that these examinations lacked guardrails, posed risks of retraumatizing children, and could be inappropriately applied, especially for children fleeing abuse or exploitation.

Section 6

Prohibition on Sharing Sponsor Information for Immigration Enforcement

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" to explicitly prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) from sharing information obtained about sponsors of unaccompanied children with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or any other federal agency for the purpose of immigration enforcement. This aims to reverse a policy that led to the targeting of sponsors for enforcement actions, which proponents argue deterred family members from coming forward and prolonged children's detention.

Section 7

Mandate for Refund of Previously Paid Fees

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to refund, within 180 days of the Act's enactment, any fees paid by individuals under the provisions of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" that are repealed or amended by this new Act. This ensures that individuals, particularly unaccompanied children, who previously paid these fees will be reimbursed.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this