The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 664·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 23, 2025

American Seabed Protection Act

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 4, 2025

Bottom line

The bill establishes a moratorium on deep seabed and Outer Continental Shelf hardrock mineral mining in U.S. waters and by U.S. entities, citing environmental risks and insufficient scientific understanding, while simultaneously commissioning a study to further assess these impacts and explore alternatives.

What it actually does

This bill, titled the "American Seabed Protection Act," prohibits the issuance of licenses, permits, or other authorizations for the exploration or commercial recovery of hard mineral resources on the deep seabed and Outer Continental Shelf, with an exception for scientific research. It also mandates the Secretary of Commerce to commission a comprehensive study by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine to assess the environmental impacts of such mining activities and evaluate alternatives to mineral use.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue the bill is a critical and necessary precautionary step to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from potentially irreversible damage caused by deep seabed mining, aligning U.S. policy with international conservation goals. They emphasize the urgent need to prevent large sediment plumes, noise pollution, and the direct loss of unique species, advocating for sustainable resource management through recycling and alternative materials given the current lack of scientific understanding.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that prohibiting deep seabed mining could hinder the United States' access to critical minerals essential for renewable energy technologies, electric vehicles, and national security, potentially increasing reliance on foreign sources or intensifying terrestrial mining, which has its own environmental footprint. They could contend that the bill prematurely shuts down a nascent industry before comprehensive research is completed or before technological advancements could effectively mitigate environmental risks.

The bill is short and clearly written, allowing for a quick and straightforward understanding of its core prohibitions and study mandate.

Section 2(b)(1)

Prohibition of Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Exploration and Commercial Recovery

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision enacts a significant moratorium by explicitly forbidding the issuance of any licenses, permits, or other authorizations required for the exploration or commercial recovery of hard mineral resources from the deep seabed. This effectively halts all U.S.-regulated deep seabed mining activities, overriding existing legal frameworks like the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act, reflecting a strong precautionary stance against potential environmental damage in these vulnerable ecosystems.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDeep seabed mining industry (potential and existing)ImpactProhibited from operating under U.S. jurisdiction.MechanismLegal prohibition on permits and authorizations.ScaleComplete halt of activity.
GroupMarine ecosystems and biodiversityImpactProtection from mining disturbances.MechanismPrevention of direct and indirect environmental impacts.ScaleGlobal, as it sets a precedent for U.S. policy.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this is a necessary precautionary measure to protect fragile and poorly understood deep-sea ecosystems from irreversible damage, aligning with international calls for a moratorium until more scientific research is conducted.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this prohibition stifles innovation and prevents the U.S. from accessing potentially vital mineral resources for technology and green energy, potentially ceding leadership to other nations.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the imperative of environmental protection against potential economic development and access to strategic minerals.

Section 2(b)(2)

Prohibition of Hardrock Mineral Mining on the Outer Continental Shelf

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision extends the mining prohibition to the Outer Continental Shelf, preventing the issuance of any licenses, permits, or authorizations for the exploration, development, or production of hardrock minerals in these areas. It supersedes relevant sections of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, ensuring that U.S. offshore waters, including those closer to shore, are protected from the potential ecological disturbances associated with hardrock mineral extraction.

Section 2(b)(3)

Scientific Research Exemption

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This clause provides a crucial carve-out, specifying that the prohibitions on deep seabed and Outer Continental Shelf mining do not apply to activities conducted solely for scientific research. This ensures that marine scientists and research institutions can continue to study these environments, gather essential data, and assess potential impacts without being hindered by the moratorium, thereby supporting informed future policy decisions.

Section 2(c)

Assessment of Environmental Impacts of Mining Activities

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates the Secretary of Commerce, acting through NOAA, to commission a comprehensive study by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. The study will thoroughly assess the environmental impacts of deep seabed and OCS mining, characterize ecosystems, quantify greenhouse gas emissions, and evaluate viable alternatives to mineral use, such as recycling and substitute materials. The findings will be reported to Congress to guide future policy.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this