The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6688·119th Congress·Introduced Dec 12, 2025

ADAS Functionality and Integrity Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 10, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to enhance vehicle safety by establishing federal guidelines and calibration standards to ensure Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) remain functional and safe even after vehicles are modified or customized.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop and publish guidelines for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) calibration, modifications, and tolerances for passenger motor vehicles model year 2028 and later. It requires these guidelines to ensure ADAS functionality is maintained after vehicle modifications and specifies that they must be based on empirical data and leverage existing safety methodologies. The bill also requires NHTSA to conduct a study on the feasibility and cost of developing these guidelines and establishes civil penalties for non-compliant manufacturers.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is crucial for public safety as ADAS become increasingly common, ensuring these vital safety systems continue to operate correctly even after vehicle modifications. They emphasize the need for clear, data-driven standards to prevent malfunctions, protect consumers, and provide a consistent framework for both vehicle manufacturers and the independent automotive aftermarket to safely service and customize vehicles.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that establishing such detailed guidelines could be overly burdensome for manufacturers and the independent aftermarket, potentially stifling innovation or increasing costs for consumers. They could also argue that defining specific 'allowable modification ranges' might be technically challenging and could inadvertently limit consumer choice or the scope of vehicle customization.

The bill is concise, allowing for a quick read, but its technical nature requires careful attention to detail for full comprehension of its implications.

Section 2(a)

Establishment of ADAS Modification and Calibration Guidelines

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop and publish guidelines within 24 months for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and vehicle dynamic systems in passenger motor vehicles from model year 2028 onwards. These guidelines must ensure ADAS functionality is maintained after vehicle modifications, covering aspects like ride height, wheel/tire dimensions, static geometry, physical displacement, and sensor/camera function. Manufacturers are also required to provide relevant vehicle tolerance and system sensitivity information.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)ImpactMandated to develop and publish complex technical guidelines.MechanismDirect statutory requirement.ScaleSignificant regulatory undertaking.
GroupPassenger motor vehicle manufacturersImpactMust provide vehicle tolerance and system sensitivity information; potentially subject to new design constraints.MechanismRequirement to provide data and adhere to future guidelines.ScaleIndustry-wide impact on design and information sharing.
GroupIndependent automotive aftermarket (repair facilities, customizers)ImpactWill need to understand and follow new calibration procedures and tolerance thresholds; potentially gain clearer standards for safe modifications.MechanismGuidelines will dictate acceptable practices.ScaleBroad impact on service and modification industry.
GroupVehicle owners/consumersImpactWill receive information about vehicle tolerances; potentially safer modified vehicles; may face increased costs for compliant modifications or repairs.MechanismManufacturers provide information; aftermarket adheres to guidelines.ScaleAffects safety and cost of vehicle ownership/modification.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of ADAS in an evolving automotive landscape where vehicle modifications are common. It provides clarity for manufacturers and the aftermarket, ultimately protecting consumers by ensuring critical safety systems remain functional.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that defining 'allowable modification ranges and tolerances' could be overly restrictive, potentially limiting vehicle customization options or imposing significant compliance costs on manufacturers and the aftermarket without sufficient flexibility.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the consumer desire for vehicle customization with the critical safety requirements of advanced driver assistance systems. It also navigates the tension between comprehensive regulatory oversight and industry flexibility in design and service.

Section 2(c) and 2(d)

Data-Driven Guidelines and NCAP Integration

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision mandates that NHTSA's guidelines must be based on empirical data derived from dynamic testing, independent research, and public data sources. Furthermore, the calibration procedures within these guidelines must reference or expand upon methodologies established by the United States New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), including a standardized scoring scale for calibration effectiveness and transparent validation criteria applicable across vehicle platforms.

Section 2(e)

Civil Penalties for Non-Compliance

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section stipulates that manufacturers of passenger motor vehicles or equipment that do not meet the guidelines issued by NHTSA under this Act will be subject to the civil penalties described under section 30165(a) of title 49, United States Code. This provides a clear enforcement mechanism for the new ADAS safety standards.

Section 3

ADAS Modification Ranges and Tolerances Study

prominently featuredstraightforward

Within 12 months of enactment, NHTSA is required to complete a study and submit a report to Congress. This study will assess the safety needs, feasibility, capability, and cost for NHTSA to develop and maintain industry guidelines for ADAS functionality in modified or customized passenger vehicles (model year 2028 and later). The study will consider various aspects of vehicle tolerance, modification ranges, calibration procedures, and test protocols, with stakeholder consultation.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this