The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6900·119th Congress·Introduced Dec 18, 2025

American Affordability Act of 2025

IntroducedTaxationOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Dec 18, 2025

Bottom line

This bill aims to reduce household expenses and stimulate specific economic sectors through a broad array of new and expanded tax credits and direct payments, primarily targeting low- and middle-income individuals and families.

What it actually does

The "American Affordability Act of 2025" is an omnibus bill that proposes extensive amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, alongside other statutory changes, to address the nation's cost-of-living crisis. It introduces new tax credits and expands existing ones across five major areas: housing and municipal infrastructure, lowering energy costs, child and dependent care, education and workforce training, and healthcare. Key provisions include significant reforms to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, new credits for affordable housing conversion and neighborhood homes, a refundable first-time homebuyer credit, a refundable renter tax credit, expansions of clean energy and electric vehicle credits, a refundable child tax credit with monthly advance payments, enhancements to child and dependent care credits, and increased eligibility for health insurance premium assistance.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill directly tackles the rising cost of living by providing substantial financial relief to families through refundable tax credits, making housing more affordable, reducing energy expenses, and expanding access to essential services like child care and healthcare. They would emphasize the comprehensive nature of the bill, addressing multiple facets of economic strain, and its potential to stimulate economic growth through targeted investments.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that the bill's extensive expansion of tax credits and direct payments could significantly increase the national debt or contribute to inflationary pressures, exacerbating the very cost-of-living crisis it seeks to address. They might also argue that some provisions could lead to market distortions or be inefficient in achieving their stated goals, potentially benefiting unintended recipients or creating administrative burdens.

The bill is 100 pages long and highly technical, requiring significant time for a thorough understanding. The complexity of its numerous tax code amendments means that a casual reading would likely miss many of its substantive effects.

Sec. 11101, Title I, Subtitle A, Part 1

Increases in State Low-Income Housing Credit Allocations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section significantly increases the per capita and minimum amounts of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) that states can allocate annually. For calendar year 2026, the per capita amount rises from $1.75 to $4.25, and the minimum amount increases from $2,000,000 to $4,876,000, with further adjustments for inflation in subsequent years.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState housing credit agenciesImpactIncreased resources for affordable housing development.MechanismHigher annual LIHTC allocation caps.ScaleSubstantial increase in available tax credits, leading to more potential projects.
GroupLow-income individuals and familiesImpactIncreased availability of affordable housing units.MechanismMore LIHTC projects can be financed.ScalePotentially significant increase in affordable housing stock.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that increasing LIHTC allocations is essential to address the severe shortage of affordable housing nationwide, allowing states to finance more projects and house more low-income families.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that simply increasing allocations without addressing underlying development costs or regulatory hurdles may not be the most efficient way to expand affordable housing, potentially leading to higher costs per unit.

Tradeoffs

Balances the urgent need for more affordable housing against concerns about the efficiency and oversight of increased federal tax credit allocations.

Sec. 11203, Title I, Subtitle A, Part 2

Expanded Student Eligibility for Low-Income Housing

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision amends the LIHTC rules to broaden the categories of students who can reside in low-income housing units without disqualifying the unit. It specifies exceptions for students who are married, disabled, veterans, have qualifying children, are victims of domestic abuse or human trafficking, or are former foster youth/homeless youth, provided they meet income limitations.

Sec. 11307, Title I, Subtitle A, Part 3

Enhanced Credit for Extremely Low-Income Housing Projects

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision increases the eligible basis for a portion of a building to 150% if at least 20% of its residential units are designated for households with incomes not exceeding the greater of 30% of area median gross income or 100% of the federal poverty line, and the housing credit agency designates the increase as financially necessary.

Sec. 11901, Title I, Subtitle A, Part 9

Repeal of Qualified Contract Option for LIHTC Properties

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section terminates the "qualified contract" option for LIHTC buildings that receive allocations after January 1, 2026. The qualified contract option allowed owners to exit the LIHTC program after 15 years by selling the property at a formula-driven price, potentially leading to the loss of affordable units. For existing buildings, it modifies the valuation to take into account rent restrictions.

Sec. 12001, Title I, Subtitle B

Affordable Housing Conversion Credit (New Section 48F)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section establishes a new investment tax credit (20% of qualified conversion expenditures, up to 30% in high-cost areas) for converting eligible commercial buildings into qualified affordable housing. The building must be at least 20 years old and was nonresidential property before conversion. At least 20% of units must be rent-restricted for individuals at 80% or less of area median income for 30 years. There's a national credit limitation of $12 billion, with additional amounts for economically distressed areas.

Sec. 12002, Title I, Subtitle B

Neighborhood Homes Credit (New Section 42A)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section establishes a new refundable tax credit for building or substantially rehabilitating homes in qualified census tracts and selling them at an affordable price to qualified homeowners. The credit amount is the lesser of the development cost gap (cost minus sale price), 40% of eligible development costs, or 32% of the national median new home sale price (up to $50,000 for owner-occupied rehabilitations). It includes a 5-year repayment requirement if the home is sold early.

Sec. 13001, Title I, Subtitle C

First-Time Homebuyer Refundable Tax Credit (New Section 36)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes a new refundable tax credit for first-time homebuyers, equal to 10% of the purchase price, up to $15,000. It includes phase-outs based on area median income and area median purchase price. The credit is subject to recapture if the home is sold within a 4-year recapture period. An election allows the credit to be transferred to the mortgage lender at closing, with the lender providing an equivalent payment to the taxpayer.

Sec. 13002, Title I, Subtitle C

Renter Tax Credit (New Section 36C)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes a new refundable tax credit for individuals who lease their principal residence and pay rent exceeding 30% of their adjusted gross income. The credit amount is a percentage of this excess, phased out based on income, and limited by 100% of the small area fair market rent. The Secretary is directed to establish a program for monthly advance payments of this credit.

Sec. 21001, Title II, Subtitle A

Restoration of Clean Energy Production Credit Phase-Out and Wind/Solar Credits

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends Section 45Y of the IRC to restore the clean energy production credit's phase-out mechanism to be based on a determination of greenhouse gas emissions from electricity production (25% of 2022 levels) or 2032, whichever is later. It also removes previous restrictions on the credit for wind and solar facilities and leasing arrangements, effectively reinstating broader eligibility.

Sec. 22001, Title II, Subtitle B

Restoration of Product Identification Number Requirement for Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit

buried in fine printstraightforward

This section restores the requirement for a qualified product identification number for items of specified property placed in service after December 31, 2025, to be eligible for the energy efficient home improvement credit (Section 25C). It defines "qualified product identification number" and "qualified manufacturer" and outlines reporting requirements.

Sec. 23002, Title II, Subtitle C

Extension of Clean Vehicle Credit Termination Date

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section extends the termination date for the clean vehicle credit (Section 30D) from September 30, 2025, to December 31, 2032. It also modifies the domestic content requirements, gradually increasing the percentage of battery components and critical minerals that must be sourced from North America or free trade agreement countries to 100% by 2029.

Sec. 24005, Title II, Subtitle D

Disaster Mitigation Expenditures Credit (New Section 28)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes a new tax credit equal to 30% of expenditures paid for qualifying mitigation activities with respect to real property owned or leased by the taxpayer. Qualifying activities include improving roof strength, creating secondary water barriers, bracing walls, protecting openings, elevating dwelling units, installing flood vents, creating buffers against wildfires, and satisfying FORTIFIED or Wildfire Prepared Homes designations. The credit can be personal or business, and the percentage is reduced if a state contributes to the expenditure.

Sec. 31001, Title III, Subtitle A

Monthly Child Tax Credit and Advance Payments (New Sections 24A, 24B, and 7527A)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section replaces the existing child tax credit (Section 24) with a new, fully refundable monthly child tax credit (Section 24A) and a credit for other dependents (Section 24B). The monthly credit is $300 per child aged 6-17 and 120% of that for children under 6 (800% for children under 1 month), with inflation adjustments. It includes phase-outs based on modified adjusted gross income. The Secretary is mandated to establish a program for monthly advance payments of this credit (Section 7527A), with provisions for presumptive eligibility, annual renewal, automatic eligibility for newborns, and resolution of competing claims.

Sec. 32001, Title III, Subtitle B

Enhanced and Refundable Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section enhances the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (Section 21) by increasing the applicable percentage to 50% (phasing down to 20% for higher incomes) and raising the maximum creditable expenses to $8,000 for one qualifying individual and $16,000 for two or more. It also makes the credit fully refundable for taxpayers with a principal abode in the U.S. or Puerto Rico and includes inflation adjustments.

Sec. 33001, Title III, Subtitle C

Refundable Adoption Tax Credit

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section makes the adoption tax credit (Section 23, redesignated as 36F) fully refundable and moves it to the refundable credits subpart. It also includes a transitional rule to treat carryforwards from the prior non-refundable credit as refundable. It directs the Secretary to provide guidance for a standardized third-party affidavit for verifying legal adoptions.

Sec. 41001, Title IV, Subtitle A

Expansion and Temporary Refundability of American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC)

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section expands the American Opportunity Tax Credit (Section 25A) from 4 to 6 years of post-secondary education. For taxable years beginning in 2026, it temporarily makes the AOTC fully refundable (instead of 40% refundable). It also mandates an outreach campaign by the Treasury to inform the public about these changes.

Sec. 42002, Title IV, Subtitle B

Restoration of Employee Business Expense Deductions

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section restores an above-the-line deduction for union dues and expenses for employees. It also reinstates the miscellaneous itemized deduction for other unreimbursed employee business expenses (subject to the 2% adjusted gross income floor), which was previously suspended.

Sec. 50001, Title V

Expansion of Health Insurance Premium Assistance Tax Credit Eligibility

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section removes the 400% of poverty line income cap for eligibility for the premium assistance tax credit (Section 36B) and adjusts the applicable percentages to ensure that no individual pays more than 8.5% of their household income for a benchmark plan, even at higher income levels.

Sec. 50002, Title V

Enhanced ACA Subsidies and Medicaid-like Benefits for Low-Income Populations in Non-Expansion States

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section provides enhanced cost-sharing reductions and additional benefits (like non-emergency medical transportation and home health services) for low-income individuals (up to 138% of poverty line) in states that have not expanded Medicaid, for plan years 2026-2028. It also provides funding for outreach and navigator programs in these states and temporarily removes employer shared responsibility penalties for employers of these low-income individuals. It further increases the FMAP for newly eligible mandatory individuals in Medicaid expansion states.

FOUND

Amends Section 42(g)(2)(B) to specify that for projects electing the average income test or those with a 130% basis boost, tenant-based assistance (vouchers) will not be treated as a reduction in gross rent for rent-restricted unit calculations. This means the full market rent can be charged, with the voucher covering the difference, without violating rent restriction rules.

Sec. 11204, Title I, Subtitle A, Part 2

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for technical adjustments to complex tax code provisions. It clarifies how federal housing subsidies interact with LIHTC rent restrictions.

Case for: Proponents argue this clarification encourages developers to accept housing vouchers, expanding housing options for voucher holders, and simplifies compliance for projects using the average income test.

Case against: No specific opposition is typically raised against this clarification, as it generally streamlines the interaction of federal housing programs.

Estimated impact: Facilitates the use of housing vouchers in LIHTC projects, potentially increasing housing choices for voucher recipients and streamlining project financing.

FOUND

This section modifies the 10-year rule for existing buildings to qualify for LIHTC. It introduces a limitation on acquisition basis: if a building was placed in service less than 10 years prior, the acquisition basis for LIHTC purposes cannot exceed the lowest amount paid for the building in the preceding 10 years (adjusted for inflation), plus capital improvements by the seller. It also changes the related party rule from a 10-year lookback to a 5-year lookback for previous ownership.

Sec. 11302, Title I, Subtitle A, Part 3

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for technical adjustments to complex tax code provisions, particularly those designed to prevent abuse or ensure fair valuation.

Case for: Proponents argue these changes prevent inflated property valuations for LIHTC acquisition credits, ensuring that credits are used for genuine rehabilitation and new affordable housing, rather than simply subsidizing property transfers.

Case against: Critics might argue that limiting the acquisition basis could make it harder to finance the acquisition of existing properties for rehabilitation, especially in rapidly appreciating markets, potentially reducing the number of such projects.

Estimated impact: Prevents potential abuse of LIHTC acquisition credits and ensures better value for federal investment, but might slightly constrain acquisition-rehab projects.

FOUND

This section modifies the "right of first refusal" for tenants or non-profits to purchase LIHTC properties at the end of the compliance period, changing it to an "option" and clarifying that it can apply to partnership interests (not just the property itself). It also clarifies that the option can be exercised with or without owner approval and in response to any offer, including from a related party. The minimum purchase price is set to the principal amount of outstanding indebtedness (excluding debt incurred in the last 5 years).

Sec. 11902, Title I, Subtitle A, Part 9

Why it matters:This is a highly technical but substantively important clarification of property rights and exit strategies for LIHTC projects, often understood only by legal experts in real estate finance.

Case for: Proponents argue this strengthens the ability of tenants and non-profits to acquire and preserve affordable housing at the end of the LIHTC compliance period, preventing properties from converting to market rate.

Case against: Critics might argue that strengthening these purchase options could reduce the residual value for initial investors, potentially deterring future LIHTC investment by making exit strategies less favorable.

Estimated impact: Increases the likelihood of long-term affordable housing preservation by empowering tenant/non-profit purchases, but may impact investor returns.

FOUND

Amends Section 168(e)(3)(B)(vi) to include certain solar or wind energy property (as described in Section 48(a)(3)(A)) in the 5-year MACRS depreciation class.

Sec. 22004, Title II, Subtitle B

Why it matters:This is a highly technical tax provision that affects the timing of deductions for businesses, often understood only by tax accountants and financial analysts.

Case for: Proponents argue that accelerating depreciation for solar and wind energy property incentivizes investment in these technologies by allowing businesses to recover costs more quickly, improving project economics.

Case against: Critics might argue that such accelerated depreciation reduces federal tax revenue and can distort investment decisions, favoring certain technologies over others.

Estimated impact: Provides a financial boost to solar and wind energy projects by improving their cash flow and internal rate of return.

FOUND

This section makes permanent several enhancements to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for individuals without qualifying children, which were previously temporary. It decreases the minimum age for eligibility to 19 (18 for qualified former foster youth or homeless youth), eliminates the maximum age limit, increases the credit and phaseout percentages to 15.3%, and raises the earned income and phaseout amounts. It also updates inflation adjustments.

Sec. 42006, Title IV, Subtitle B

Why it matters:These are technical adjustments to a major social welfare program, often understood in detail only by tax policy experts.

Case for: Proponents argue these changes provide crucial financial support to low-wage workers without children, helping them stay in the workforce and out of poverty, and making the EITC more equitable.

Case against: Critics might argue that expanding the EITC for childless workers increases federal spending and could potentially disincentivize work for some individuals at certain income thresholds, though the EITC is generally considered a work-incentive program.

Estimated impact: Significant financial benefit for millions of low-wage workers without children, reducing poverty and increasing economic security.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency
Ask Ledger AI about this