The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 6983·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 8, 2026

PRICE Act

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ-8]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 8, 2026

Bottom line

This bill imposes a significant, phased mandate on large data centers to become entirely self-sufficient in electricity generation, primarily using clean energy sources, aiming to reduce their impact on the public grid and promote renewable energy adoption.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that all large data centers in the United States must generate 100% of the electricity they consume annually. It further requires that a significant portion of this self-generated electricity come from clean energy sources, starting at 75% by January 1, 2035, and increasing to 100% by January 1, 2040. Non-compliant data centers face civil penalties of up to $100,000 per day.

Proponents argue

Supporters would argue that this bill addresses the rapidly growing energy consumption of data centers, preventing them from straining existing grids and contributing to rate inflation for consumers. By mandating on-site clean energy generation, it promotes energy independence for a high-demand sector and accelerates the transition to renewable energy, contributing to climate goals.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that this mandate places an enormous, potentially unfeasible, and costly burden on data centers, which could lead to increased operational costs, discourage investment in the U.S., or force facilities to relocate. They may argue it's an overreach that could destabilize the digital infrastructure and ultimately harm consumers through higher service costs.

The bill is very short and straightforward to read, but its implications are far-reaching and require significant consideration.

Section 1

Short Title

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes the official short title of the Act as the "Preventing Rate Inflation in Consumer Energy Act" or the "PRICE Act," providing a common name for referring to the legislation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral public, legislators, mediaImpactProvides a concise and memorable name for the legislation.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

Supporters would argue that a clear and descriptive short title like the "PRICE Act" helps communicate the bill's intended purpose of preventing energy rate inflation to the public and stakeholders.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against short titles, though critics might argue the title is misleading if they disagree with the bill's stated purpose or effectiveness.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies in choosing a title that is both concise and accurately reflects the bill's potentially complex impacts, rather than just its stated intent.

Section 2(a)

Mandate for Data Centers to Generate All Consumed Electricity

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This core provision requires every data center in the United States to generate 100% of the electricity it consumes each year. This means data centers would need to install and operate their own power generation facilities sufficient to meet their entire annual electricity demand.

Section 2(b)

Phased Clean Energy Mandate for Data Center Generation

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision introduces a phased requirement for the electricity generated by data centers. Starting January 1, 2035, at least 75% of their self-generated electricity must come from clean energy sources. By January 1, 2040, this increases to 100% clean energy.

Section 2(c)

Civil Penalties for Non-Compliance

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes that any data center violating the electricity generation requirements will face a civil penalty of up to $100,000 per day until the violation is corrected. It also mandates the Secretary of Energy to create an administrative process for issuing these penalties within 30 days of the Act's enactment.

Section 2(d)

Definitions of "Clean Energy Source" and "Data Center"

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section defines key terms used in the Act. A "clean energy source" includes solar, wind, battery, green hydrogen, hydropower, and geothermal. A "data center" is defined as a facility described in section 453(a)(1) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 that consumes at least 50 megawatts each day.

FOUND

The definition of "data center" relies on a cross-reference to section 453(a)(1) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17112(a)(1)). This external reference defines a data center as "a building or portion of a building whose primary function is to accommodate the equipment used for processing, storing, and transmitting digital data and that has a designed maximum total power demand of 100 kW or greater."

Section 2(d)(2)(A)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to avoid reprinting lengthy definitions and ensure consistency with existing law. However, it requires extra effort from the reader to fully grasp the bill's applicability.

Case for: Incorporating by reference streamlines the bill and ensures consistency with established legal definitions, avoiding potential conflicts or ambiguities that could arise from creating a new, slightly different definition.

Case against: Critics might argue that relying on external references makes the bill less accessible and transparent to the average reader, requiring legal research to understand its full scope.

Estimated impact: This reference, combined with the 50 MW daily consumption threshold in 2(d)(2)(B), significantly narrows the scope of affected data centers to only the largest, most energy-intensive facilities. The original EISA definition of 100 kW is much broader, but the 50 MW daily consumption filter is the dominant factor here.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this