The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 70·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 3, 2025

No SmartPay for Anti-2A Companies Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
Committees
Oversight and Government Reform Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 3, 2025

Bottom line

The bill seeks to leverage federal contracting power to oppose the use of distinct merchant category codes for gun retailers by payment processors.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the Administrator of General Services (GSA) from awarding new contracts under the SmartPay Program to commercial payment systems that utilize a payment processing agency which has implemented a specific merchant category code (MCC) for gun retailers. Essentially, it aims to prevent federal government payment contracts from going to companies that categorize gun sales with a unique MCC.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill protects Second Amendment rights by preventing financial institutions from tracking or flagging gun purchases, which they view as a form of surveillance or discrimination against lawful gun owners and businesses. They contend that unique MCCs could be used to create registries or restrict access to firearms, and that the federal government should not contract with entities that facilitate such practices.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that merchant category codes are standard tools used by financial institutions for fraud detection, risk management, and compliance with anti-money laundering regulations, not for tracking lawful gun owners. They may contend that prohibiting such codes hinders efforts to identify suspicious transactions that could be linked to illegal activities, and that this bill interferes with the private sector's ability to manage its own risk and operations.

The bill text is very short and can be read quickly, allowing ample time for a thorough understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Prohibition on Contracts for Commercial Payment Systems Using Gun Retailer MCCs

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section forbids the General Services Administration (GSA) from entering into new contracts under its SmartPay Program with commercial payment systems if those systems use a payment processing agency that has created a specific merchant category code (MCC) for gun retailers. The SmartPay Program provides government employees with charge cards for official purchases. The intent is to prevent the federal government from doing business with payment processors that categorize gun sales distinctly.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral Services Administration (GSA)ImpactRestricted contracting optionsMechanismLegal prohibition on awarding contracts to certain payment systems.ScaleAffects all new SmartPay contracts.
GroupCommercial payment systems/payment processing agenciesImpactPotential loss of federal contractsMechanismCompanies using gun retailer MCCs would be ineligible for GSA SmartPay contracts.ScaleAffects companies seeking federal government business.
GroupGun retailers and purchasersImpactIndirect protection against specific transaction trackingMechanismBy disincentivizing payment processors from using gun-specific MCCs, it aims to prevent potential tracking of gun purchases.ScaleBroad, affecting the financial privacy of gun-related transactions.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for protecting the privacy and Second Amendment rights of gun owners by preventing financial institutions from creating a de facto registry of gun purchases through unique merchant codes. They believe such codes could be misused to target or discriminate against lawful gun owners and businesses, and the federal government should not support such practices with its contracts.

Critics contend

Opponents contend that this provision interferes with the legitimate business practices of financial institutions, which use MCCs for fraud detection, risk assessment, and compliance with financial regulations. They argue that a specific MCC for gun retailers could help identify suspicious transaction patterns related to illegal arms trafficking or other illicit activities, and that prohibiting its use could hinder law enforcement efforts.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances concerns about individual privacy and Second Amendment rights against the potential for enhanced financial oversight and the ability of financial institutions to manage risk and detect illicit activities. It creates a tension between government contracting power and the operational autonomy of private payment processors.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this