The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
Back to REPORTED IN HOUSE
Comparev1INTRODUCED IN HOUSEJan 15→v2REPORTED IN HOUSEMay 13
SubstantiveINTRODUCED IN HOUSE → REPORTED IN HOUSE

What changed between these versions

A substantive modification to the bill's funding allocation for national charter school activities and a clarification regarding advance payments. V2 introduces a specific 15% allocation for competitive grants for charter school activities in non-grant states, previously part of a general remainder. It also clarifies advance payment provisions for subgrants and adds a corresponding heading.

Overview

A handful of changes across two sections. · V2 refines and clarifies funding mechanisms and administrative procedures, particularly regarding advance payments and the allocation of funds for national charter school activities.

The most significant change in v2 is the restructuring of funding allocations for national charter school activities under Section 4305(a) of the ESEA, introducing a dedicated 15% allocation for competitive grants. Additionally, v2 modifies the treatment of Section 4303(d)(3) of the ESEA, replacing v1's instruction to strike it with new provisions for advance payments and adding a corresponding heading. V2 also clarifies the renumbering of subparagraphs in Section 4303(g)(1).

+

Major additions

+
Section 3(3)(A) (amending ESEA Section 4303(d) heading)

V2 adds an instruction to insert "Advance Payments; " into the heading of subsection (d) of Section 4303 of the ESEA, so it reads "Peer Review; Advance Payments; Grant Period". This explicitly acknowledges the new advance payment provisions.

This addition ensures the heading of the relevant ESEA subsection accurately reflects the new administrative flexibility provided for advance payments, improving clarity and guidance for entities receiving grants. It highlights the importance of the new advance payment mechanism.

+
Section 3(6)(A) (amending ESEA Section 4303(g)(1))

V2 adds a parenthetical instruction "(and redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (E) as (B) through (D), respectively)" to the existing instruction to strike subparagraph (B) of ESEA Section 4303(g)(1).

This clarifies the administrative action required after striking subparagraph (B), ensuring proper renumbering of the subsequent subparagraphs. It prevents potential ambiguity in the statutory text post-amendment.

−

Deletions

−
Section 3(3)(D) (amending ESEA Section 4303(d))

V1 included an instruction to redesignate paragraphs (4) and (5) of ESEA Section 4303(d) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. This instruction was contingent on v1's proposal to strike the original paragraph (3).

The deletion of this instruction in v2 is a direct consequence of v2's decision to amend, rather than strike, paragraph (3) of ESEA Section 4303(d). This means the original paragraphs (4) and (5) of ESEA Section 4303(d) will retain their numbering, as there is no gap created by a deletion of paragraph (3).

~

Modifications

~
Section 3(3) (amending ESEA Section 4303(d)(3))
V1 proposed a deletion of an existing ESEA provision, while v2 replaces that provision with entirely new text establishing advance payment mechanisms. This shifts from removing a provision to introducing new administrative flexibility.

This change significantly impacts eligible applicants and State entities by explicitly allowing and mandating advance payments of grant funds. This can improve cash flow and operational efficiency for charter schools and State entities, providing greater financial flexibility for planning and program design.

Before

V1 instructed the striking of paragraph (3) of ESEA Section 4303(d), which would have removed an existing provision from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.

After

V2 amends paragraph (3) of ESEA Section 4303(d) to introduce detailed provisions for "Advance payments". Specifically, it mandates that eligible applicants may request advance payments of subgrant funds, State entities must provide these, and the Secretary must ensure advance payments to State entities, in accordance with federal regulations.

~
Section 4(1) (amending ESEA Section 4305(a))
The allocation structure for national activities is modified from a two-tiered system (10% + remainder) to a three-tiered system (10% + 15% + remainder). This carves out a specific percentage for competitive grants that was previously part of a broader "remainder" category.

This modification provides a dedicated and guaranteed funding stream (up to 15%) for competitive grants to support charter school activities in States that do not receive direct grants under Section 4303. This could increase opportunities for charter schools in such states to access federal funding for eligible activities, potentially expanding their reach and impact.

Before

V1 allocated "not more than 10 percent" of funds for specific national activities (paragraph (1)) and then directed the "remainder" of funds (after paragraph (1)'s uses) to be used for grants under subsection (b) and competitive grants for 4303(h) activities in States that did not receive a grant under 4303 (paragraph (2)).

After

V2 maintains the "not more than 10 percent" allocation for specific national activities (paragraph (1)). However, it then introduces a new paragraph (2) that specifically allocates "not more than 15 percent" of funds for competitive grants for 4303(h) activities in States that did not receive a grant under 4303. The remaining funds, "after the uses described in paragraphs (1) and (2)," are then allocated for grants under subsection (b) (new paragraph (3)).

Scope

Meaningful expansion or narrowing — The changes are concentrated in two key sections related to funding allocation and grant administration, specifically affecting the Elementary and Secondary Education Act's provisions for charter schools. — V2 represents a refinement within the existing policy direction of supporting charter schools. It enhances administrative flexibility and clarifies funding priorities rather than altering the fundamental purpose or scope of the charter school programs. — The changes primarily interact with and refine the specific ESEA sections being amended (4303 and 4305), particularly regarding funding flows and administrative requirements for grants and subgrants. The new advance payment provisions streamline financial operations for grant recipients.

Impact analysis

Eligible applicants for charter school subgrants (e.g., charter schools, developers)

Gains increased financial flexibility and administrative support.

Under v2, these applicants are explicitly allowed to request advance payments of subgrant funds, and State entities are mandated to provide them. V1's instruction to strike the relevant ESEA paragraph would have left this provision undefined or potentially removed.

State entities awarding charter school subgrants

Experiences procedural changes and gains clarity on funding mechanisms, with a mandate to provide advance payments.

V2 mandates that State entities provide advance payments to eligible applicants upon request and ensures they receive advance payments of grant funds from the Secretary to facilitate this. V1's instruction would have removed the ESEA paragraph that v2 now amends to establish this.

Charter schools and eligible applicants in States that do not receive direct grants under Section 4303

Gains increased access to federal funding opportunities.

V2 creates a dedicated allocation of "not more than 15 percent" of national activity funds for competitive grants specifically for these entities. In v1, funding for these competitive grants was part of a broader "remainder" category, without a specific percentage carve-out.

The Secretary of Education and federal agencies administering charter school programs

Experiences procedural changes and increased specificity in funding mandates.

V2 explicitly requires the Secretary to ensure advance payments to State entities and to implement the new tiered funding allocation for national activities. V1 had a different instruction regarding ESEA 4303(d)(3) and a less granular allocation for national activities.

Ask Ledger AI about this