The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7153·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 20, 2026

Agriculture and National Security Act of 2026

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 20, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to strengthen the integration of national security considerations into the USDA's mission by enhancing leadership, interagency collaboration, and strategic reporting on agricultural vulnerabilities.

What it actually does

This bill, the "Agriculture and National Security Act of 2026," directs the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to elevate national security alongside homeland security in its operations. It mandates the appointment of a Senior Advisor for National Security within the Office of the Secretary, authorizes personnel exchanges with defense and intelligence agencies, and requires biennial reports to Congress and the National Security Council on food and agriculture vulnerabilities, especially concerning emerging technologies and foreign influence.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill is a critical step to safeguard the nation's food supply and agricultural infrastructure from evolving national security threats, including foreign adversaries and emerging technologies. They contend that elevating national security within USDA and improving interagency information sharing will proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities before they become crises, ensuring food security and economic stability.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that the bill could lead to an over-securitization of the agricultural sector, potentially burdening farmers and agricultural businesses with new regulations or data requirements without clear benefits. They might also raise concerns about the potential for mission creep within USDA, diverting resources from its core functions of supporting agriculture and rural development.

The bill is short and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick review by interested parties.

Section 3(a)

Elevation of National Security within USDA

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of Agriculture prioritize national security in addition to homeland security within the Department. It specifically requires increasing the number of USDA staff with security clearances and access to classified systems and networks, integrating national security concerns more deeply into the department's core functions.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of Agriculture (USDA)ImpactIncreased focus and resources on national security, changes in staffing and access to classified information.MechanismDirect mandate to the Secretary.ScaleDepartment-wide shift in strategic priority.
GroupNational Security AgenciesImpactImproved collaboration and information sharing with USDA.MechanismUSDA staff gaining clearances.ScaleEnhanced interagency intelligence integration.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this is essential to recognize food and agriculture as critical national security assets, ensuring the sector is protected from sophisticated threats. Increasing cleared personnel will facilitate better intelligence integration and proactive defense.

Critics contend

Some might argue that this could lead to an unnecessary expansion of the USDA's security apparatus, potentially diverting resources from traditional agricultural support programs or creating bureaucratic hurdles for staff.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between maintaining USDA's traditional focus on agricultural support and integrating a robust national security mandate, potentially requiring a reallocation of resources and a shift in departmental culture.

Section 3(b)

Creation of Senior Advisor Position

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish and appoint a Senior Advisor for National Security within the Office of the Secretary within 180 days of the bill's enactment. This advisor will serve as the principal national security advisor to the Secretary, act as the primary liaison with the National Security Council, coordinate national security activities across USDA, and engage stakeholders to identify vulnerabilities.

Section 3(c)

Authorization for Interagency Detailees

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends existing law to explicitly authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to send USDA personnel to, and receive personnel from, defense, national and homeland security, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies. These exchanges can occur with or without reimbursement and are intended to improve information sharing, vulnerability identification, and risk mitigation related to food and agriculture.

Section 3(d)

Mandate for Biennial National Security Reports

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision requires the Secretary of Agriculture to submit a comprehensive report to Congress and the National Security Council every two years, with the first due within 180 days of enactment. These reports must assess gaps and limitations in national security efforts related to food and agriculture, covering areas like foreign influence, data control, land acquisition, supply chain dependencies, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies. The reports must also detail actions taken, policy recommendations, and required resources.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this