The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
2 versions
Back to REPORTED IN HOUSE
Comparev1INTRODUCED IN HOUSEJan 21→v2REPORTED IN HOUSESep 1
SubstantiveINTRODUCED IN HOUSE → REPORTED IN HOUSE

What changed between these versions

A substantive modification to the broker definition exception. v2 adds a new requirement for personal services entities regarding dispute resolution and liability, clarifies the scope of broker supervision, and refines definitions related to non-securities activities and broker activity. The core purpose of providing an exception for registered representative-owned personal services entities remains consistent.

Overview

A handful of substantive changes, including one major addition and several key modifications to existing provisions and definitions. · v2 clarifies and strengthens the conditions under which a personal services entity can qualify for the broker definition exception, particularly by enhancing oversight and establishing explicit liability and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The most significant change in v2 is the addition of a new condition requiring personal services entities (PSEs) to agree to the jurisdiction of a self-regulatory organization's dispute resolution forum for customer disputes and to remain subject to the registered representative's financial obligations. Additionally, v2 clarifies that the representative's registered broker must supervise both the representative and the PSE, and refines the scope of activities a PSE can undertake while maintaining its exception. The fundamental intent of providing a broker definition exception for these entities remains unchanged.

+

Major additions

+
Section 2(a)(G)(i)(VIII) (new)

This new clause stipulates that a personal services entity (PSE) must agree in writing to submit to the jurisdiction of an applicable self-regulatory organization's (SRO) dispute resolution forum. This submission is solely for the purpose of enforcing awards against the registered representative (RR) arising from their securities business. The PSE must also agree to be bound by any such award to the extent of its assets and remain subject to all financial obligations, liabilities, and remedies of the RR under applicable Federal and State securities laws and SRO rules.

This addition significantly enhances customer protection by ensuring that assets held by a PSE are accessible for satisfying arbitration awards against a registered representative. It clarifies the PSE's liability in customer disputes, preventing the use of PSEs to shield assets from legitimate claims, thereby increasing accountability for representatives operating through such entities.

~

Modifications

~
Bill Title
A change in terminology from 'exemption' to 'exception'.

This is a semantic clarification, aligning the language more precisely with how such provisions are typically framed in securities law. It does not alter the substantive effect of the provision, which is to create a carve-out from the broker definition.

Before

The bill's title referred to providing an 'exemption' from the definition of a broker.

After

The bill's title now refers to providing an 'exception' from the definition of a broker.

~
Section 2(a)(G)(i)(I), (IV), (V)
Clarification of the responsible party and expansion of the scope of supervision.

The change from 'the broker' to 'the representative's registered broker' provides greater specificity regarding which broker is responsible. Crucially, the expansion of supervision in subclause (IV) to include 'the personal services entity' ensures that the registered broker's oversight responsibilities extend directly to the entity receiving compensation, enhancing regulatory control and accountability over the entire compensation arrangement.

Before

These clauses referred to 'the broker' instructing payments, maintaining supervision over the registered representative, and having a written agreement with the personal services entity.

After

These clauses now specify 'the representative's registered broker' for instructing payments, maintaining supervision over 'the registered representative and the personal services entity', and having a written agreement with the personal services entity.

~
Section 2(a)(G)(i)(III)
Refinement of the prohibited activities for a personal services entity.

The change from 'broker or dealer activity' to 'any other broker activity' and the addition of 'any other' clarifies that the PSE's activities must be strictly limited to receiving compensation on behalf of the registered representative, reinforcing the narrow scope of the exception. It removes the explicit mention of 'dealer activity' from this specific clause, though the definition of 'broker activity' in (iii)(II) still encompasses both.

Before

This clause stated that the personal services entity (PSE) must not engage in 'broker or dealer activity', other than receiving compensation.

After

This clause now states that the PSE must not engage in 'any other broker activity', other than receiving compensation.

~
Section 2(a)(G)(ii)
Clarification of the location of records and the specific purpose of the Commission's determination.

The addition of 'in the possession of the personal services entity' clarifies the scope of records the PSE itself must hold. The slight rephrasing in subclause (II) from 'to not be considered a broker' to 'for the exception' is a minor semantic alignment, but the overall impact is to ensure comprehensive record-keeping directly by the PSE to verify its ongoing compliance with the exception's requirements.

Before

This clause required the personal services entity (PSE) to maintain and make available books and records that 'both-- (I) the broker from which the personal services entity receives compensation is required to maintain... and (II) the Commission determines necessary and appropriate to demonstrate that the personal services entity continues to meet the requirements to not be considered a broker by reason of this subparagraph.'

After

This clause now requires the PSE to maintain and make available 'all books and records in the possession of the personal services entity that-- (I) the broker from which the personal services entity receives compensation is required to maintain... and (II) the Commission determines necessary and appropriate to demonstrate that the personal services entity continues to meet the requirements for the exception under this subparagraph.'

~
Section 2(a)(G)(iii)(II)
The defined term was changed from 'Broker or dealer activity' to 'Broker activity'.

This modification streamlines the terminology by defining 'Broker activity' while still encompassing activities of both brokers and dealers in its description. This aligns with the change in Section 2(a)(G)(i)(III) to refer to 'any other broker activity', ensuring consistency in how prohibited activities are referenced and defined.

Before

The definition for 'Broker or dealer activity' stated it means 'an activity undertaken by a broker or a dealer who is registered, or required to be registered, under this Act.'

After

The definition for 'Broker activity' now states it means 'an activity undertaken by a broker or a dealer who is registered, or required to be registered, under this Act.'

~
Section 2(a)(G)(iii)(IV)
Refinement of the permissible non-compensation activities for a personal services entity.

This modification broadens the scope of non-securities related activities a PSE can undertake beyond just 'administrative purposes and other benefits,' as long as they are not securities-related. This provides greater flexibility for registered representatives to manage their non-securities business through the PSE, while maintaining the strict separation from regulated broker activities.

Before

The definition of 'Personal services entity' stated it is an entity established by a registered representative to receive compensation for services 'and for administrative purposes and other benefits.'

After

The definition of 'Personal services entity' now states it is an entity established by a registered representative to receive compensation for services 'and for other activity that is not securities-related.'

Scope

Meaningful expansion or narrowing — Changes are concentrated within the newly added subparagraph (G) of Section 3(a)(4), affecting specific conditions and definitions related to the broker definition exception. — v2 represents a refinement within the same policy direction. It strengthens the regulatory framework and customer protections surrounding the exception for personal services entities, rather than altering the fundamental intent of creating the exception. — The changes primarily interact with and modify the specific conditions and definitions within the proposed broker definition exception. The new liability provisions for PSEs (Section 2(a)(G)(i)(VIII)) introduce a significant new interaction with existing SRO dispute resolution mechanisms and Federal/State securities laws concerning representative liability.

Impact analysis

Personal Services Entities (PSEs)

Primarily procedural and potentially negative in terms of increased liability exposure, but also offers some clarity and flexibility for non-securities related activities.

PSEs are now explicitly required to agree to SRO dispute resolution jurisdiction for customer claims against the associated registered representative and to be bound by awards to the extent of their assets. They are also subject to the registered representative's financial obligations under securities laws. The scope of their permissible non-securities activities has been broadened, but the scope of broker activities they cannot engage in has been clarified.

Registered Representatives (RRs) utilizing PSEs

Procedural, with increased accountability and oversight, potentially reducing the ability to use PSEs to avoid liability.

RRs will operate under a clearer framework where their associated PSEs are directly accountable for customer dispute awards and their financial obligations. The broker's supervision now explicitly extends to the PSE.

Registered Brokers (Broker-Dealers)

Procedural, with increased clarity and slightly expanded supervisory responsibilities.

The 'representative's registered broker' is now explicitly identified as the party responsible for instructing payments, approving amounts/timing, and maintaining records. Their supervision responsibilities are expanded to explicitly include the personal services entity, not just the registered representative.

Customers of Registered Representatives utilizing PSEs

Positive, enhancing recourse and protection.

Customers now have a clearer path to recovery against assets held by a personal services entity in the event of an arbitration award against a registered representative, as the PSE is explicitly bound by SRO dispute resolution and remains subject to the RR's liabilities.

Ask Ledger AI about this