The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7287·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 30, 2026

Lewis and Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act

IntroducedWater Resources DevelopmentSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 29, 2026

Bottom line

H.R. 7287 authorizes a federal feasibility study for a significant regional water infrastructure expansion project in the Upper Midwest, setting parameters for cost-sharing for the study and future construction.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior, in coordination with the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System, Inc., to conduct a feasibility study for expanding the water system's capacity and reach in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota. The study will determine if the proposed project should be authorized for construction and recommend the appropriate non-Federal share of construction costs, which must be at least 25 percent. The bill authorizes $10,000,000 for the study, with the federal share not exceeding 50 percent of the study costs.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is a crucial first step in addressing the long-term water supply needs of municipal, rural, and industrial users in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota. They contend that a federal feasibility study is essential to thoroughly evaluate the technical, environmental, and financial viability of expanding the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System, ensuring sustainable water resources for economic development and public health in the region.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while water infrastructure is important, authorizing a federal study with a significant federal cost-share for a regional project could set a precedent for increased federal involvement and spending on local infrastructure projects that should primarily be funded by state and local entities. They might also question the necessity of federal involvement in a study that could potentially be funded and conducted by the non-Federal project entity or state governments.

The bill is very short and clear, allowing for quick comprehension by any interested reader.

Section 3(a)(1)

Mandate for Lewis and Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study, in collaboration with the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System, Inc., to assess the viability of expanding the water system across Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota. The study aims to determine if the proposed project is feasible for construction and to outline the necessary steps and resources.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupResidents and industries in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota served by or potentially served by the Lewis and Clark Regional Water SystemImpactPotential for improved long-term water security and economic development if the project is deemed feasible and constructedMechanismThe study will identify needs and potential solutions for water supplyScaleRegional, affecting multiple states and numerous communities
GroupLewis and Clark Regional Water System, Inc.ImpactDirect involvement in the study process and potential for federal support for future expansionMechanismCoordination with the Secretary of the InteriorScaleOrganizational

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a comprehensive federal feasibility study is critical for ensuring that any future expansion of this vital regional water system is well-planned, cost-effective, and environmentally sound, laying the groundwork for reliable water access.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that requiring a federal study for a regional water project could lead to delays and unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles, suggesting that the non-Federal entity or states could initiate such a study more efficiently.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire for thorough federal oversight and expertise in large infrastructure projects versus the potential for slower progress and increased administrative costs compared to a state or locally led initiative.

Section 3(a)(2)

Feasibility Report and Construction Authorization Recommendations

prominently featuredstraightforward

Upon completing the study, the Secretary must produce a report recommending whether the expansion project should be authorized for construction. This report will also specify the appropriate non-Federal share of construction costs, which must be at least 25 percent, based on the financial capability of the non-Federal entity to pay for construction and ongoing operations.

Section 3(b), 3(c), 3(d)

Feasibility Study Cost-Sharing and Appropriations

prominently featuredstraightforward

The bill mandates a cost-sharing agreement for the feasibility study, with the federal share not exceeding 50 percent of the total study costs. It also authorizes an appropriation of $10,000,000 to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this section, specifically for the study.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this